Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sirchtruth
It doesn't say they gave her 20 years per student. It says they *could* give her 2 - 20 years per count. They *could* give her a suspended sentence and probation. The article doesn't say what the sentence actually was.

If you think the *only* thing immoral about this was the breach of the student-teacher relationship, then Mike Adams has proved his point about the rapid devolution of norms down to the level of "I wanna."

9 posted on 08/21/2012 5:23:46 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("He who does not have 3,000 years at his fingertips is living hand-to-mouth." -J Wolfgang von Goethe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
It says they *could* give her 2 - 20 years per count.

Right, that's outrageous for what happened! These were consenting adults, breach of the professional relationship should only be disciplinary in regards to her profession.

Make the max sentence revocation of her teaching license and never allow her to teach again!

It is a moral issue since the consenting age is 18 by law. Law is law for a reason because we aren't a dictatorship in this country who tries to dictate morality like they did in Britain. Ever heard of the DOC? Personally, do I think what she did was morally wrong, OF COURSE! However, the law is what matters in this case and in all cases. If we don't have LAWS to abide by and think morality trumps law for sentencing we are not America, and the idea ceases to exist.

18 posted on 08/21/2012 6:16:39 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson