Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JediJones

I don’t know why he would. He just did.

It is true that it is nowhere near the discussion they were having ... which makes the statement all the more stupid. He answered a question he wasn’t even asked.

SnakeDoc


160 posted on 08/22/2012 4:45:30 PM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("I've shot people I like more for less." -- Raylan Givens, Justified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: SnakeDoctor
I don’t know why he would. He just did.

No he didn't. You're making a nonsense accusation that has nothing to do with what he said. At no time did he state or imply that he would assume a woman was lying about being raped just because she was pregnant. You must be borderline insane or verbally illiterate to think he said anything even close to that, or you didn't listen to the interview. That is not an issue they addressed at all in the discussion. And you're an idiot to assume that just because he said pregnancy as a result of rape was rare that it means he or anyone would assume a pregnant woman must be lying about being raped. Rare does not mean non-existent. Gold is rare, but I can guarantee you a lot of people have it.

242 posted on 08/22/2012 5:32:43 PM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson