He implied that if a woman’s body did not “shut that down” that she wasn’t legitimately raped.
What is more, he didn’t have to say ANY of that to make the point he was supposedly trying to make.
No he didn't. Not in the slightest. You appear to have poor listening skills.
If you read the article he based his opinion on, his argument was directly parallel with it. The author says that if a woman is forcibly raped, as opposed to statutory, that pregnancy is a rare result due to stress and other factors. There is absolutely no attempt to smear anyone in the rare cases where it does happen. Being "rare" isn't a smear or an insult, it's just a statistical reality.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2921696/posts?page=50