Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion and rape
Fox News ^ | 8/23/12 | Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

Posted on 08/23/2012 6:12:14 AM PDT by DallasBiff

The criticisms of the recent absurd comments by Missouri Republican Congressman Todd Akin, who at this writing is his party’s nominee to take on incumbent Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill in November in a contest he had been expected to win, have focused on his clearly erroneous understanding of the human female anatomy. In a now infamous statement, in which he used the bizarre and unheard-of phrase “legitimate rape,” the congressman gave the impression that some rapes of women are not mentally or seriously resisted. This is an antediluvian and misogynistic myth for which there is no basis in fact and which has been soundly and justly condemned.

Akin also stated that the female anatomy can resist unwanted impregnation. This, too, is absurd, offensive and incorrect. Medical science has established conclusively that women cannot internally block an unwanted union of egg and sperm, no matter the relationship between male and female. I think even schoolchildren understand that.

What has gone unmentioned, however, in the cacophony of condemnation by Republicans and Democrats, is the implication in Akin’s comments that rape is not a moral justification for abortion. In that, he is correct: It is not.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; akin; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: DallasBiff
the congressman gave the impression that some rapes of women are not mentally or seriously resisted.

You mean like statutory rapes, right, Judge? Kind of an important example to leave out, don't you think?

41 posted on 08/23/2012 1:28:47 PM PDT by JediJones (Too Hot for GOP TV: Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin, Allen West and Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Her choice, not yours.

She is the one that looked into his eyes, not you.

Oh, do you believe women are just brood mares?

42 posted on 08/23/2012 3:51:07 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (All Y'all White Peoples is racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
We are humans. We have laws. We have procedures for investigating events. We have hearings and trials to determine the truth.

We are not mere dumb animals ~ or 'brood mares' as you suggest.

If we are going to use the authority and power of the state to execute then you should be willing to first prove the truth, and then be willing to carry out the punishment no matter how old the target of execution becomes.

Let's say it took 21 years to determine the truth in a specific instance, and your target of execution is an adult. Do you imagine that it is just to send the executioner out to strike her down just because you think she is an animal? What about her own children, or "spawn" ~ do you get to kill them too?

Frankly private murder is no basis for a modern society.

43 posted on 08/23/2012 5:49:45 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson