Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: barmag25

Good decision.


2 posted on 08/23/2012 3:45:10 PM PDT by jb729
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jb729

It was one of things Cain wanted.


3 posted on 08/23/2012 3:47:40 PM PDT by Perdogg (Mutts for Mitt all agree - Better in the crate than on the plate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jb729

yes


4 posted on 08/23/2012 3:47:49 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jb729
Good decision.

Mine is an honest question - why is a gold standard a good idea?

I get that tying a currency to a real commodity imparts natural value and forces more immediate inflation/deflation economic responses with regard to the currency value. That can be good or bad, particularly good if it limits the speed the printing presses run. Potentially bad if a situation requires short term debt to resolve (e.g., funding WWII).

But why gold? Why not multiple precious metals or materials? Why not high quality steel? Why not grains?

I need educated on how picking a specific metal as a standard is a good idea economically. Why not Rhodium, or platinum, etc.?

13 posted on 08/23/2012 4:20:51 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson