Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Article: "Lobe-Finned Fish Supplies Surprises" (ceolacanth)
Institute for Creation Research ^ | 8-24-2012 | Brian Thomas

Posted on 08/24/2012 7:56:58 AM PDT by fishtank

Lobe-Finned Fish Supplies Surprises by Brian Thomas, M.S. | Aug. 24, 2012

It was once the banner fossil behind the idea that land-walking creatures emerged from fish with overgrown fins. The lobe-finned fish was found in strata deemed 400 million years old—close to the time when land creatures supposedly evolved—making a tidy evolutionary story. But that didn't last long. Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer became famous for finding the live creature on a small fishing boat in 1938. A new survey of the critically endangered fish's genes shows that they are not finished divulging surprises.

A team led by German researchers from Ruhr-University Bochum published the first genetic population survey of these storied fishes in the journal Current Biology.1 They analyzed DNA sequences from 71 adult coelacanth fish.

The team analyzed the most variable region of the mitochondrial chromosome, the "d-loop." After 400 million years, different fish populations should show significant differences, but only 8 of 726 ceolacanth d-loop base pairs showed variation. Such a low number of differences is easily explained if coelacanth are only thousands of years old.

The study authors wrote in Current Biology, "Either the evolutionary rate in Latimeria chalumnae [coelacanth] is extremely slow or haplotypes may have diverged rather recently after the species went through a bottleneck."2 To have only produced 8 out of 726 base pairs in mitochondrial DNA's most highly variable region after 400 million supposed years would be a rate so "extremely slow" that it defies credibility.

On the other hand, recent species divergence fits the genetic data. But it also fits the creation model, wherein coelacanth fish were created only thousands of years ago. Some died and were buried in Noah's Flood to later become world famous fossils, and a few others survived through the Flood to eventually produce today's populations.

As if still-living coelacanths were not enough of a blow to evolutionary dogma, its genetics now also confirm biblical creation.

References

Wieler, J. 400 million years old, but still capable of adapting. Ruhr-University Bochum press release, July 13, 2012.

Lampert, K.P. et al. 2012. Population divergence in East African coelacanths. Current Biology. Published online before print. 22 (11): R439-R440.

* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.

Article posted on August 24, 2012.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation

Image from article.

1 posted on 08/24/2012 7:57:04 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

2 posted on 08/24/2012 8:00:14 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

3 posted on 08/24/2012 8:10:34 AM PDT by sunny48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
Rather than the cherry picking and false conclusions of Brian Thomas, let's actually hear from the paper's authors:

“Despite an overall low genetic diversity, there is evidence for divergence of local populations. We assume that originally the coelacanths at the East African Coast derived from the Comoros population, but have since then diversified into additional independent populations: one in South Africa and another in Tanzania. Unexpectedly, we find a split of the Comoran coelacanths into two sympatric subpopulations. Despite its undeniably slow evolutionary rate, the coelacanth still diversifies and is therefore able to adapt to new environmental conditions.”

Oh look - nowhere did they state that the Earth is 6,000 years old, or that evolutionary theory is challenged.

4 posted on 08/24/2012 8:24:55 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormer
Shame on you -- this thread is a fact-free zone. Old earth creationists simply don't believe in biology. To be a young earther, however, you can't believe in any other scientific field either.

How do you argue with people who simply ignore -- or make up -- facts? I think you just laugh at them and keep them far away from your children.

5 posted on 08/24/2012 8:43:52 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sunny48

and yet Ceolacanth is nowhere to be found on the menu at Joe’s Crab Shack...


6 posted on 08/24/2012 8:58:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

The perfect example of evolution ... I'd like to see the Bible Thumpers try and refute evidence like that!

7 posted on 08/24/2012 9:08:42 AM PDT by Zakeet (Debtors prison ... the perfect solution to politicians who incur debts we can't repay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Anyone actually interested in the ceolacanth, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, and James Smith who identified the first specimen, would enjoy “A Fish Caught in Time”, by Samantha Weinberg.


8 posted on 08/24/2012 9:44:55 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
The facts surrounding the processes and natural history of the Earth are so much more interesting than the lies and codswallop concocted by those motivated by the fear of reality.
9 posted on 08/24/2012 9:49:21 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Do all these people really believe their God want them to be ignorant fools?


10 posted on 08/24/2012 10:51:00 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
From what I have read, if you eat Ceolcanth you will get the worst case of diarrhea in history. The fish is quite inedible.
11 posted on 08/24/2012 11:11:49 AM PDT by JimC214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Their quote:

“We assume that originally the ...”

They ASSUME.

They ASSUME.

They ASSUME.


12 posted on 08/24/2012 11:25:55 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stormer

It doesn't know, Ernest. It assumes, but it doesn't know.

13 posted on 08/24/2012 11:26:59 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

14 posted on 08/24/2012 12:02:05 PM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson