Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx

Because McCaskill didn’t stand a chance against Brunner or Steelman. Just dang it! I so despise Claire McCaskill!


96 posted on 08/24/2012 2:12:29 PM PDT by KansasGirl ("If you have a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."--B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: KansasGirl

Because McCaskill didn’t stand a chance against Brunner or Steelman. Just dang it! I so despise Claire McCaskill!


Steelman would have little chance against McCaskill. The liberal media would have a field day with the “Sarah Palin candidate” and mobilize the McCaskill forces.

I like Palin, but she would have mobilized the McCaskill people and the DNC. Steelman was no sure win

Also, Palin in the past has supported Open Borders/Pro-Amnesty/Anti-American liberals like John McCain and Jeff Flake for Senate races...so she has pushed establishment GOP over conservative candidates. Akin’s National Security/Border Security positions were too strong for Palin, judging by her other choices

Seems the only ones that have a problem with Akin are Pro-Abort Liberals outside of Missouri.


112 posted on 08/24/2012 2:21:33 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (Just because someone has an "R" next to their name, does not make them a Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson