[gov_bean_ counter]

... or weed out the Paulbots who dishonestly ran on the Romney slate.

[Jedidah]

Bingo.

And who are seriously still thinking they can pull off some stunt and get the nomination for Paul.

[Cinnamontea]

... or weed out the Paulbots who dishonestly ran on the Romney slate.

Bingo.

[muawiyah]

Some doufous let the Paulbots run a campaign for Paul, and he's not a real Republican ~ he simply caucuses with them in the House.

Where Preibus and Romney need to tighten things up is the definition of who meets the brand standards.

It's pretty loose these days. Out of the 16 candidates I examined closely, only 3 had been lifelong conservative Republicans.

All the rest had recent, or questionable ties to the Republican party.

Screwing around with who gets to go to the convention will probably encourage exactly the sort of thing I want to see STARTING IN JANUARY AFTER THE INAUGURATION. So, Mittbots play into my hands!(Bwahahahaha)

[Bigtigermike]

These rule changes has nothing to do with this year but in 2016 and beyond! Wake up!!’

we may one day have nothing but insiders and D.C types as delegates and on the committee within 4 years and the grassroots and tea party folks on the outside looking in. If that happens then it’s best to prepare to startup our own “second” party

[Tex-Con-Man]

Paul and his nuts have been establishing a template for future mischief. There has to be a way to stop someone from gaming the system. And that's all they were doing...no popular support, just caucus hijinks.

[submarinerswife]

... or weed out the Paulbots who dishonestly ran on the Romney slate.

Exactly. They (Paultards)are nuttier than the Scientologists.

[WOSG]

“... or weed out the Paulbots who dishonestly ran on the Romney slate.”

Exactly.

PaulBots engaged in subterfuge and fraud by refusing to do what they are bound to do as delegates, and now the insiders want to ruin it for everyone because of PaulBot shenanigans.

The only silver lining is Ron Paul wont be running in 2016 ...