Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joe fonebone

We sent people to DOT regulated sites. The drug test would specifically screen for that drug along with others.

Proof of that drug only would not result in failure.

The test gives more complex results than overall pass/fail, although p/f is usually the only information shared unless specifically requested in advance.

We did not have people operating heavy machinery, but they would be walking around in areas where heavy machinery was routinely in operation.


16 posted on 08/27/2012 6:10:20 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Not wanting to argue with the safety premise, but the usual “pee” test gives results for past 30 days use. Other than being an indicator of past usage, specific to recreational drugs like pot, 30 days prior use does not affect performance and safety. This point is not about harder, more dibilitating and longer effecting drugs.

In Australia, the standard drug test is a mouth swab which shows drug use for previous few days not 30 days, which is more appropriate for workplace safety.

Like many other areas of how life has evolved in America, many things have evolved from over-reaction to a problem. We need to return to more common sense approaches in many areas not to mention political. The Austrialian “swab” drug test seems more common sensicle.


19 posted on 08/27/2012 7:34:05 AM PDT by X-spurt (It is truly time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson