Seems some of you lost what passes for your minds based on the head line and never even bothered to read the story.
Really pathetic how desperately eager supposed "conservatives" around here are to be water boys for the Democrat propaganda machines tactics of diversion and distraction.
I was thinking that the better strategy might be to get elected, then start your vigorous crackdown.
Like the Dems do all the time.
This plank, if the op is true, will bring to bear the resources of a wealthy, connected, and popular (among some circles) industry in working to defeat the GOP.
I have not researched this but weren’t there lots of first amendment cases over the years defining what is legal, what is hardcore, and so forth? This will lead to ambiguity and confusion, which could mean that the GOP spends lots of time and effort discussing this issue, while Obama’s team tries to make the case that a Romney win would be even worse than an Obama second term.
I read the story.
I do believe that the Repubs should be focusing on the economy, debt, incompetence, etc, instead of porn.
And...as far as porn goes, on the one hand, I don’t really have an opinion except to say that I am happy that the anti-porn people exist. If they didn’t then porn would be delivered to our inboxes on an hourly basis.
On the other hand, I am glad that porn exists. Otherwise, the anti-porn people would find some other cause to try to embrace, like, anti-( insert cause here ).
The porn/anti-porn groups tend to cancel each other out, thank goodness.
The obscenity laws do conflict with the First Amendment. I don’t know how anyone can get around that.