Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

Then watch and see as he grants Obamacare waivers to all 50 States. (D.C. deserves it)

He will take down the Regulatory burdens to real energy development.
He will fire the unconstitutional czars.
Romney will stop federally funded abortion.

He won’t be looking for opportunities to enrich the union thugs, in or out of government.

He WILL respect the Constitutional constraints and separation of powers.
So, some of the areas where he and I disagree, I don’t believe we have to worry about the House and Senate supporting him on.


97 posted on 08/28/2012 1:33:04 PM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry
Then watch and see as he grants Obamacare waivers to all 50 States. (D.C. deserves it)

No! What an absurd and horridly tyrannical idea: "he grants"!?
So the Soverign States must beg relief from the Federal President who grants them leave to not abide by a clearly contraconstitutional law?

He will take down the Regulatory burdens to real energy development.
He will fire the unconstitutional czars.
Romney will stop federally funded abortion.

I don't really believe any of that. Most of the regulatory burdens are in place due to Congress: it's their responsibility to remove those burdens -- to do otherwise (via executive order) is nothing less than to advocate for MORE non-/selective-enforcement of laws: just like immigration laws! The Czars aren't in any power that the Congress didn't let them have {congress can investigate/impeach} -- in fact, it allows them [govt in general] to have convenient 'fall guys' for the implementation of unpopular/questionable policies.

As for Romney stopping federally funded abortion -- I simply do not believe that he can do that*: it is congress that makes the budget.
*There are things he can do that involve the enforcement of laws that he could use to punish abortion (like ordering DOJ to prosecute cross-state-line abortions as murder); but I don't see him making such a controversial" move.

He won’t be looking for opportunities to enrich the union thugs, in or out of government.

But will he be willing to cut down the thug that is the Union?

He WILL respect the Constitutional constraints and separation of powers.

Most of the stuff you've spouted off as reason to vote for him is violative of the separation of powers.

So, some of the areas where he and I disagree, I don’t believe we have to worry about the House and Senate supporting him on.

I would hope so; but then I have a very low opinion of the Congress. They ought to be tried for malfeasance and more.

103 posted on 08/28/2012 3:19:34 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

Mr. RomneyCARE destroys Constitutions (like he did in Mass.
to impose Romney Marriage).

Mr. RomneyCARE supports ObamaCARe/RomneyCARE.

Mr. RomneyCARE INVENTED Death Panels.

Mr. RomneyCARE coveredup the BIG DIG.

Mr. RomneyCARE is for himself. 100% of the time.

NO TO RINOS.
I WILL NOT SUPPORT ROMNEY (who is an Obama twin).


107 posted on 08/28/2012 5:03:25 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson