Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike; Perdogg

from the article:

“The second rules change would front load winner takes all primaries. Grassroots conservatives point to both Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum as reasons to stop this rule. Had there been front loaded winner takes all primaries, neither the Gingrich nor the Santorum campaigns would have been able to get any traction.

“This is going to be a fight on the floor if they don’t back down. They have too much pride to back down and we’re going to humble them,” said one delegate to the convention.

Another tells me, “They’ve gotten social conservatives comfortable with the platform and now that they’re placated [Team Romney] is going to undercut them with this change.”

Speaking to one person familiar with the rules changes who supports them, I’m told a number of people support the changes because they see the current rules as efforts by Michael Steel to “liven up” the process, but all it did was run up the cost and drag it out. “Are we really going to keep the status quo because the guy who brought the convention to hurricane country in hurricane season thought they were a good idea?” the delegate asked.

The Rules Committee will meet at 2:00 p.m. today in Tampa to consider the rules changes. If they make it through the committee, delegates are telling me they promise a huge floor fight and there’s no guarantee Team Romney will get its way given the current make up of the delegates in Tampa.***

So, they gave partially on the first issue, but didn’t get close to a compromise on the other 2.

Just like the Rino Media...report a compromise but have it be only a small piece of the truth


10 posted on 08/28/2012 7:43:27 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

RaDiO siLenCe over at Drudge


18 posted on 08/28/2012 7:49:52 AM PDT by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Curiously, the Romney operatives announced a “compromise” not to the scrambling delegates, but to the New York Times!

This, when Rule 12 was left hanging in the balance! The conservatives Tea Party are getting worked over and peeled off on the basis of their naievete and procedural ignorance I fear.


91 posted on 08/28/2012 9:24:26 AM PDT by RitaOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson