Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KC_Lion

The Civil War relegated state militias (including today’s National Guard) to irrelevance; the country simply couldn’t have state militias from one region fighting state militias from another (in which one chose the mantle of “federal” troops).

Look back even farther to the War of 1812: Some New England states wouldn’t even fight.


137 posted on 08/29/2012 1:31:28 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: kearnyirish2
I respectfully disagree, to me the height of State Militia was the Civil War.

That is why it's alternate name is "The War Between the States"

You had the Regiments of National Guard of the 20th Maine, 69th New York etc, fighting against the 3rd Arkansas and the 58th Alabama.

Those Units were called up and created by the states, granted to serve in the Federal/Confederate Army, but they were state creations none the less.

Also once the war was over those units were disbanded, we had essentially had an Army of Citizen Soldiers, not full time professionals.

The Same System was used for the Spanish-American War in 1898, States forming Military units to be banded together under the Federal Flag.

The REAL nail in that system came with the The Militia Act of 1903 (A Progressive Idea by the way) It was the Federal Government increasing its power at the expense of the States and sticking its nose where it didn't belong.

152 posted on 08/29/2012 7:04:39 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Normalcy results in the creation of life, Sodomy results in AIDS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson