Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EBH

You can technical-legalese your way around any law with patriot-act era gibberish. Sure, PCA formally stated Army, but the point was to exclude major active-duty military components from acting as occupiers in any part of America. That particular act came from hard lessons learned after the CW.

Don’t dance the legalese twist, the point is that we are watching the military, police and federal law enforcement morph into a seamless National State Security Force far beyond anything our Founding Fathers warned us against so often and passionately.

The Marines “integrating” with many national police departments in order to get ready for unspecified “Special Reactions” or whatever is very worrisome.

Hey, let’s give them a billion HP bullets and thousands of new and surplus armored trucks while we’re out it.

No problemo, nothing but blue skies ahead, eh?


191 posted on 08/29/2012 9:05:55 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
I am not disagreeing. And you don't want to play around with the legalese aspect?

Well, when the SHTF that is exactly what “they” are going to do and claim. All these years of the liberal left playing legalese games and you are witnessing this taking form now....and you still want to cry PCA?

I think it much better to state the dance and learn the steps...before getting on the ballroom floor. They are already signaling PCA won't stand and won't protect us.

195 posted on 08/30/2012 6:12:36 AM PDT by EBH (Courage, Trust, Sacred Honor, Truth, Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson