Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: italianquaker

No, they can report that there was no INCREASE because last week’s figures were revised UPWARD by the amount of the increase so they can report claims remained FLAT, week to week. Otherwise, the headline would have to read “Umemployment claims up by 2,000”. These revisions only happen every week and what, 68 out of the past 69 weeks have seen these same upward “revisions”?


8 posted on 08/30/2012 6:27:59 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: laconic

“No, they can report that there was no INCREASE because last week’s figures were revised UPWARD by the amount of the increase so they can report claims remained FLAT, week to week.”

Bingo...we have a winner !!!


23 posted on 08/30/2012 7:11:30 AM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: laconic

Exactly. Suppose next week the numbers are 377,000, but the previous week (this week) is revised upward to 377,000 - “flat” again! We can go from 372 to 374 to 377 all the while the numbers are flat. The press may as well just run the headline “It’s not my boyfriend’s fault.”


34 posted on 08/30/2012 8:50:44 AM PDT by lawdvd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson