Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
My prediction (FWIW): Akin beats McCaskill, hands-down. Even though he has less money to deploy, thanks to Rience Preibus (sp???) and friends. They folded like a cheap suitcase at the first sign of "trouble."

"trouble"? Akin was troubling during that interview, especially about the question of rape and abortion, and everybody knows it.

Now the question is on who he blames for his(Akin's) mistake, the GOP or himself, and can he get over his bitterness of making a self inflicted wound or focus on Claire McCaskill.

Notice how Akin has kept his mouth shut he is up in the polls against McCaskill.

14 posted on 08/31/2012 10:58:06 AM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DallasBiff
Hey Dallas, Rove and his highhanded moderate cronies did what they could to put on the ballot a candidate of their choosing.... If you can, look at Akin’s voting record during the Bush years.... Akin was a conservative ‘spender’ not a moderate sending US into a debt crisis..

Yes Akin did give these little toadies the opportunity to shove him out, but, this was not the beginning, and his ‘pro-life’ stand is the least of what bugs and bothers these fiscal liberals.

28 posted on 08/31/2012 11:26:18 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Have you donated to the 'resurrection of Akin' yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: DallasBiff; Alamo-Girl
"trouble"? Akin was troubling during that interview, especially about the question of rape and abortion, and everybody knows it.

So, I'm supposed to accept that a man of sterling character and rock-solid conservative principles is to be thrown under the bus, because he had a mild case of "foot in the mouth disease?"

Nobody on earth with the possible exception of that ninny, Barbara Boxer, would see in Akin's remarks any indication that he was trying to "legitimize" rape. Or to see that it is anything but a criminal act, a horrific crime perpetrated mainly against women.

But Akin's question — Who should pay the price for the crime? The perpetrator of it, or the innocent pre-born child? — is worth thinking about.

The GOP-E (whatever that is) wants him "dead" because Akin actually supports — passionately — the right to life; but it is inconvenient to their plans that a "social issue" like this should intrude on their carefully constructed plans for winning this election (including the Senate).

Whatta bunch of wussies!

I mean, I know they like to do things "by the numbers" (read: polls). But what about defending the principles which are clearly stated in the GOP platform, and the people who advance them — like Akin?

My sense is Akin is taking the fight to McCaskill, not wasting time defending himself against the GOP establishment. He may be short on bucks, but I believe he will win this fight.

It seems to me the people of Missouri aren't a bunch of dithering morons who run for the hills anytime there is a fabricated "problem" like this.

The choice between Akin and McCaskill is certainly clear enough. She is nothing but a mouthpiece for the political Left trying to keep her job and her party in power. Akin is a man of substance and principle who clearly believes that the right to life is a gift of God, which is protected by our Constitution.

JMHO FWIW

39 posted on 08/31/2012 11:55:22 AM PDT by betty boop (We are led to believe a lie when we see with, and not through the eye. — William Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson