Debbie Wasserman Schultz On Romney’s Speech: He Had ‘Audacity To Not Lay Out Any Specifics’

Mediaite ^ | 8/31/12 | Alex Alvarez

[Nachum]

On Friday, Starting Point host Soledad O’Brien sat down with DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz to discuss Mitt Romney‘s RNC speech. O’Brien started things out by asking her guest what most worried her, as a Democrat, about the speech. (Snip) “Well, actually, what is deeply concerning to me is as an American is that Mitt Romney sort of had the audacity to not lay out any specifics at all,” she replied, “but gave us some very nice platitudes about how he would create jobs, 12 million of them, reduce the deficit,

[Nachum]

Ah Debbie, the gift that keeps on giving.

[mnehring]

Specifics like Hope & Change?

[grobdriver]

Bingo!

[gov_bean_ counter]

... more proof that one should never shower with a toaster...

[DannyTN]

Pot Calls Kettle Black

Or

Hope & Change 2008 meet Hope & Change 2012.

[DannyTN]

Pot Calls Kettle Black

Or

Hope & Change 2008 meet Hope & Change 2012.

[Col Frank Slade]

Debbie Blabbermouth strikes again.

[FreedBird]

She talks and looks mentally ill

[Red Badger]

She’s just pissed that his wife has better hair than her...........

[Tublecane]

This is the one criticism you can expect to hear, ad nauseum, of every candidate, from class president to emperor of the world. And it’s true, bug trivially so. The reason politicians speak in glittering generalities is that specifics are dangerous. Ask the guy who got specific about pregnancy from tape or the guy who said “read my lips “ or the guy who promised to close gitmo

[Tublecane]

bug = but

tape = rape

[RavenLooneyToon]

That's right Debbie, your all knowing god will not be told about the plan until the debates. Not before. Your incredible all seeing, Nobel laureate will have to find out about the plans in front of, and while the entire nation watches how idiotic and racist this ass-clown is.
Mitt will use numbers and logic to kick the crap out of your Communist Messiah,and he will do so while watching his opponent retort with soaring language, nose in the air and a smug look, with no clue as to the beating he will be subjected to.
No Debbie, you idiot, you will not be told what to prepare the babbling fool of what to expect.

[FrankR]

Ol’ Debbie Washerwoman Shultz is losing it.

What we’d like to see is some specifics on obama’s college records, draft card, and yes...his “forged” birth documents.

If obama ever says anything “specific”, it turns out to be a lie...otherwise it’s just vague slogans and sound bites designed to steer his sheep in any given direction.

They’re going to have to fit ol’ Debbie with a straight jacket before it’s over.

[M Kehoe]

May I make a suggestion to Debbie Blabbermouth? You need to find a very good attorney to keep your parents out of prison. Quickly.

5.56mm

[tumblindice]

I thought `The Audacity of Hope' was a trademarked pile of poopie words used by dhims when inspirational, make-believe stuff was being said, like Obama skittles-excreting horned horses. But now dreadlock Bow-wow is saying Mitt is audacious? She's blowing my mind! Yeah baby!

[Bryanw92]

Specifics like hope, change, lowering oceans, healing the planet, never hearing anything in church, etc??

[null and void]

I live in mortal dread that Obama will replace Biden with Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

[ronnyquest]

"Debbie Wasserman Schultz On Romney’s Speech: He Had ‘Audacity To Not Lay Out Any Specifics’"

You mean like Obama in nearly every one of his speeches?

[Steely Tom]

Well, actually, what is deeply concerning to me is as an American is that Mitt Romney sort of had the audacity to not lay out any specifics at all,” she replied...

This from a woman who's party leader told us they had to vote for Obamacare in order to find out what was in Obamacare.

[Raycpa]

Lets compare specifics with Obama’s speech.