To: Kaslin
When you add in the cost of the battery depreciation, you get a calculation of about 14.3 cents per mile for the Volt. As the tech site notes: A compact car getting 35 mpg would cost 10 cents per mile using $3.50-a-gallon gasoline. So in other words, the Volt, in addition to the high cost to purchase, costs 43% more to operate than a conventional car. I wonder how they come up with these figures without using the number oif miles that need to be driven to make the numbers have meaning?
I have no doubt the Volt is much costlier to operate (and even higher without the "Gov't" rebate at our expense, but the equation is missing a vital part.
9 posted on
09/01/2012 5:16:17 AM PDT by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: trebb
I have no doubt the Volt is much costlier to operate (and even higher without the "Gov't" rebate at our expense, but the equation is missing a vital part.
18 posted on
09/01/2012 5:43:46 AM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: trebb
“When you add in the cost of the battery depreciation, you get a calculation of about 14.3 cents per mile for the Volt. As the tech site notes: A compact car getting 35 mpg would cost 10 cents per mile using $3.50-a-gallon gasoline. So in other words, the Volt, in addition to the high cost to purchase, costs 43% more to operate than a conventional car. “
Wrong: A Democratic-controlled government will fix this. Recalculate these figures with gas at $15.00/gallon. See? Problem solved!
23 posted on
09/01/2012 6:34:04 AM PDT by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson