Skip to comments.
Homosexual Commercial Tyranny
TFP ^
| 8/28/2012
| Gary J. Isbell
Posted on 09/01/2012 6:26:52 AM PDT by IbJensen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
The homosexuals are winning the war and there appears to be nothing the political animals are doing about it!
Why don't these weasels understand what a danger these pervets and their stinking agenda are to America?
It's all about our children!
1
posted on
09/01/2012 6:26:58 AM PDT
by
IbJensen
To: IbJensen
This is ridiculous. They should turn around and sue them for religious reasons.
2
posted on
09/01/2012 6:30:55 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
To: TribalPrincess2U
I guess perversions come before religion now.
0bama’s legacy.
3
posted on
09/01/2012 6:32:06 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
To: IbJensen
We concluded the other day that writing a provision into the contract that a portion of the cost of each reception would be donated to an organization like the National organization for Marriage, which supports one man-one woman, would be a good way of dissuading the same sex crowd.
4
posted on
09/01/2012 6:32:12 AM PDT
by
gusopol3
To: IbJensen
Sadly too the people of VT, many transplanted New Yorkers, strongly support such policies against the independent and free businesspeople. The state is heavily anti-business, nothing like Ethan Allen presumably would have envisioned.
5
posted on
09/01/2012 6:33:16 AM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Akin's the One!)
To: IbJensen
They want the votes. They could care less about the humanity they so tout.
6
posted on
09/01/2012 6:33:36 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer. FREEDOM OR FREE STUFF- YOU GET ONE CHOICE, CHOOSE WISELY)
To: IbJensen
They should immediately get a restraining order and work on getting this all the way up to SCOTUS if necessary. FIGHT THIS CRAP - “gay rights” is an oxymoron and has no place in our society. I don’t hate homosexuals, some are friends of mine, but I loathe and despise their political agenda
7
posted on
09/01/2012 6:33:45 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: IbJensen
8
posted on
09/01/2012 6:36:57 AM PDT
by
preacher
(Communism has only killed 100 million people: Let's give it another chance!)
To: gusopol3
We concluded the other day that writing a provision into the contract that a portion of the cost of each reception would be donated to an organization like the National organization for Marriage, which supports one man-one woman, would be a good way of dissuading the same sex crowd.Good idea, and it goes to my point that people of faith just need to be smarter about how they do business. Why did the manager need to disclose the owner's religious leanings? She didn't, a mere "sorry, we're booked" would have sufficed.
9
posted on
09/01/2012 6:42:23 AM PDT
by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: IbJensen
Another example of “Lawfare”. The use of the high cost of justice to bully people into doing whatever you want, whoever can afford to spend the most money wins. This is one of the reasons we had a Revolution in 1776.
10
posted on
09/01/2012 6:48:07 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again.")
To: IbJensen
This article really says it all: A polite refusal which ought to have been met with simply seeking one of the many, many inns which would accomodate gay wedding receptions, turns into punitive litigation and a warning to others. Scary and depressing both. Needs to be reversed.
To: IbJensen
simple problem actually.
the day before the wedding just pull up the carpet, set off an fumigation bomb, and then repaint the interior. They can have their wedding and the Inn will get some well deserved upkeep.
12
posted on
09/01/2012 6:48:54 AM PDT
by
Dick Vomer
(democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat they sh#t on.)
To: IbJensen
Combine the state’s involvement with marriage with the state’s ability to decide who one will or will not do business with, and this is what you get.
Freegards
13
posted on
09/01/2012 6:49:38 AM PDT
by
Ransomed
To: Ransomed
We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.
14
posted on
09/01/2012 6:50:35 AM PDT
by
IbJensen
(Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
To: IbJensen
Stupid. All they had to say is that the venue was not available that day. Period.
15
posted on
09/01/2012 6:57:10 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: IbJensen
I made the mistake of going to ‘Disney World the week after Gay Days. I didn't know about it and had a bunch of kids along. There were a lot of holdovers from the gay week before and it was sickening. Finally, while in line for something, the guy in front of us was reaching his hand down the back of his gayboy’s fishnet short (transparent except for a cod piece in front) and had his fingers in the gay boys butt crack. That was it for me. Vacation cut short, the kids loved Charleston where we stayed at the swank Charleston Place Hotel. Best money I ever spent getting out of Homo World.
16
posted on
09/01/2012 7:02:04 AM PDT
by
anton
To: TribalPrincess2U
Exactly.
This is a first amendment issue. Freedom to practice your religion, and freedom of assembly. Freedom of association conversely implies a freedom to DISASSOCIATE with those who you choose to NOT associate in the first place.
When will someone get some nutz and fire back at these pigs?
17
posted on
09/01/2012 7:06:40 AM PDT
by
ConradofMontferrat
(According to mudslimz, my handle is a Hate Crime. I just Hope they don't like it.)
To: IbJensen
Never settle.
I would close my business and move elsewhere before I gave perverts one cent
18
posted on
09/01/2012 7:09:32 AM PDT
by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: IbJensen
The O’Reilly’s should have never backed down, ever. There are a wealth of conservative legal organizations who would have been willing to defend their case, much of it pro bono.
19
posted on
09/01/2012 7:23:50 AM PDT
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: anton
Walt Disney would be rolling in his grave if he knew what his heirs (and those they hired) were doing to his vision for ‘family entertainment’. Heartbreaking. We lived in California and heard the expression ‘Moushwitz’ to describe working for the various Disney ventures. The Disney organization in NO WAY resembles the original intent of Walt Disney.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson