Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: txrangerette
Well my dear, I hope your post is mainly directed to the second person in the to box, because my take wasn't the same.

Michelle Malkin first balked at seeing Eastwood's brilliant skit as positive and fantastic, but now understands the great impact it has.

A performance as simple as this was takes some people a bit of time to understand it's significance.

It was the most important part of the convention IMO.

The reaction of the audience was phenomonol!

Sure, some people won't/don't “get it,” it takes a certain creative mindset to understand the depth and importance of the Eastwooding.

69 posted on 09/01/2012 10:10:05 AM PDT by Syncro (The Tea Party is Dead--MSM/Dems/GOP-e*** LONG LIVE THE TEA PARTY!***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Syncro

Nice take on Eastwood and letting time decide its importance. Interesting tidbit. The Gettysburg address was panned when the first articles describing the event came out. Major newspapers considered it a dud.


101 posted on 09/03/2012 3:48:23 PM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson