Replies

Bopp is the main culprit behind the addition of the immoral, unconstitutional “pain-capable unborn children” clause in the “pro-life” platform plank.

Which was no surprise to me. He’s been pushing that garbage for years. Pushing it right into the laws of the United States, and many of the States.

You have probably never stopped a single abortion, purists usually don't have much practical effect.

James Bopp has helped stop State and Federal funding to the abortion industry.

You are absurd, all you want to do is help Obama.

You have probably never stopped a single abortion, purists usually don't have much practical effect.

James Bopp has helped stop State and Federal funding to the abortion industry.

You are absurd, all you want to do is help Obama.

This is where I think you actually stray from the complete all-out fight to save every possible unborn child.

I know you have an argument you think is pure, but when purity doesn’t save as many lives as political expediency could, we should push both, not attack those who have found a way to save a life.

Your opposition would be like being against protesting abortion clinics, under the argument that since abortion should be illegal, simply blocking women from getting INTO the clinics is a half-assed effort when we should be closing them.

Whereas in fact picketers SAVE LIVES, even if they don’t shut down the clinics. And crisis pregnancy centers save lives, even though they aren’t directly involved in stopping the abortion mills. And yes, politicians pushing things like the partial birth abortion ban, and the concept of pain-capable unborn as a way to regulate and discourage abortions, is a good thing. It will save more lives than simply following your plan.

Of course, electing Romney will save more unborn lives than voting for you in the election. Not pure, but saving more lives.