Why is there always an “and” in there, Chgocal? Repeal Obamacare...and replace. It’s not getting rid of regulations, it’s “modernizing” them. Supply-siders don’t talk out of both sides of their mouth like that. Cutting taxes is what we expect from Republicans, but Bush 2 did that, and it didn’t stop him from expanding government and having the 2nd highest amount of czars other than Obama. Let’s keep in mind Romney is the guy who said he wanted to index the minimum wage to inflation in the primaries. Just one example among many as to why he needs to work a lot harder if he’s going to convince conservatives that he’s a supply-sider. The mealy-mouthed lip service to supply-side economics isn’t going to cut it from the man who openly repudiated the Reagan administration as he began his political career.
“Repeal Obamacare...and replace”
It means just that. Repeal the monstrosity social program that is Obamacare, and replace it with something reasonable.
Tort reform and being allowed to purchase insurance across state lines would be a start.
But, I don’t think you would disagree that something has to be done to reign in health care costs, would you?
Bad mouthing supply-siders, too?
” The mealy-mouthed lip service to supply-side economics isn’t going to cut it from the man who openly repudiated the Reagan administration as he began his political career.”
Key words...”as he BEGAN his political career.”
I don’t know about you, but my views have changed over the years. I’ve become more conservative, so I will wait and see what he says before I judge him.
This is coming from one for whom Romney was her last choice.
But, this choice is much better than the alternative.
You can argue all that you want, but it is what it is.