Posted on 09/02/2012 10:49:10 PM PDT by Arec Barrwin
At the end of Bush's term. Those legislative actions arguably helped to keep the illusion of economic viability alive, at least so far. Obviously, there was no "Plan B" and there still isn't.
But FDR continued Hoover's policies? And Ubama continued Bush's? That's like comparing a kid playing with matches to a maniac spraying a village with napalm. Sorry, no sale.
FRegards,
LH
we have been dealing with fiat money since the Bank of the United States
Regardless of how BAD Bush was.... he is NOT a Moslem influenced foreigner who has anti-american and anti-colonialism as the root motive for his actions. The Neo-cons are jerks and corrupt as hell, but they ARE still Americans. D’Souza IS right about that.
Public service had become Public? Serve US!
Bingo! You have a winner here Matthew.
When the ‘RATs went in to control Congress in January 2007 unemployment was 4.2.
You really have to be stuck on stupid to think that Obama is just a continuation of the George W. Bush regime. The differences are greater than any two administrations in American history.
Never a fan of Bush, but if you look at Bush’s first four years where he had to deal with the recession he inherited and 9/11 and two wars simultaneously, he still never ran up $1.5 trillion deficits a year like Obama.
If he wants to attack Bush for prescription drug entitlements, no child left behind, amnesty for illegals and other left-wing compassionate conservative BS, that is his right, but that doesn’t mean Obama isn’t responsible for his own record.
Why do people always compare presidents?
Presidents are responsible for their own records.
Just because Bush sucked, Obama doesn’t get a pass for sucking worse.
Bush was a big spending, pro-amnesty RINO on economics but the problems did not start the day GW Bush became President as Gary North is trying to say, or did say.
bump!
Yep, Nixon took us out of Bretton Woods in 71. Nixon's policies were hard-core Statist. Nixon believed first in government.
Liberty and limited government were as much an anathema to Nixon as any far-left Rat today.
Thanks a lot Nixon for your stupid EPA idea. I despise 99.9999 % of all politicians. They are mostly scum of the Earth. Reagan was the only Constitutional respecting President in the past 80 years.
Let us assume that you are an honest and conscientious up-and-coming young politician who manages to win election to a district which might go either way and you become a representative in the United States Congress. If you want to do the right thing, your first problem is you must buck the structure of your own party.
The structure of your own party is determined by Representatives who have attained authority and responsibility by virtue of their survivability and tenure. They learned that if they permit their party to be painted as the party without compassion, that is the party of fiscal responsibility, the party loses power and they themselves risk losing their sinecure. So the leadership of the Republican Party is disinclined to suffer Mavericks in the ranks and certainly disinclined to permit the party to become tainted with the real essence of reform. They know the Democrats will quite literally charge them with throwing grandma over the Cliff. They know the donors of their own party expect the preferences of corporate welfare. They know the consequences of governing responsibly. Every pressure in Washington makes them disinclined to do so.
Their disinclination is reinforced by the fact that they know that they will not get an even chance in the media. They know they will be depicted to the electorate as mean-spirited. They know the media will seek out and concentrate on some diversionary topic such as the misbehavior of one of their members, and so indoctrinate the electorate that they will throw the election against those who advocate fiscal responsibility.
So you as a young and up and coming libertarian reformer are very soon faced with the choice of crying in the wilderness or becoming a careerist. The system is so strong that virtually everyone goes along to get along.
Senators and the President face similar structural problems.
Ultimately we should think about pointing the fingers at ourselves because we are the ones who make ourselves susceptible to pandering, payoffs, and propaganda.
There is, after all, a school of thought that says that in a democracy the people ultimately get the government they deserve.
Try Wilson.
Signed the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 on December 23, 1913
Try Taft.
Launched the 16th Amendment in June, 1909.
FDR did a lousy job New Dealing. He spent and spent and continuously changed courses keeping business off balance.. Sound Familiar? Hoover was bad and his incessant tinkering with the economy surely caused problems, FDR caused and sustained the Depression for at least eight years longer than if he had done nothing.
Most of North's points are reasonable, but the deficit was almost nonexistent when Pelosi took over the Speaker ship in 2007. Bush and his new tone always prevented him from stopping the bleeding by VETO. He failed, O’Bumbler did far more damage.
One p[oint as to the Wars. Bush received over whelming Biparisan approval from congress to go into Afghanistan AND Iraq. Sometimes being the hyper power REQUIRES that belligerent countries pay the price. The wars where fine, The hanging around trying to salvage mentally ill societies from their own desire to live like 12th century idiots was the problem. Get in kill as many as you can, get out. Rinse & Repeat as necessary.
Clearly still scratching my head why our former president never appeared at the Republican convention. I’ve never seen anything like it. My liberal co-workers joke about it at work.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
I tell my Liberal friends that when it comes to spending, (and spending is our most problematic symptom), Bush was a Liberal. He never vetoed any spending, until some minor things late in his second term.
Therefore, Obama is not the opposite of Bush - he’s Bush in a hurry. Obama is Bush on steroids. So if you hated Bush, you must REALLY loathe Obama.
Is he counting the expansion of Medicaid at the state level or merely looking at the federal spending side?
Between the Income Tax and the Federal Reserve I think we can lay the planting of the seed of our present debacle at the feet of Woodrow Wilson (despite his constitutionally having nothing to do with it and it being proposed under Teddy Roosevelt).
Amen, you are preaching to the choir.
Dear old Dad always said, "Once the parasites outnumber the hosts, it's all over."
Of course, it was inevitable that the parasites would eventually outnumber the hosts. This is because natural political gravity dictates that the path of least resistance to re-election is to create more and more victims and parasites from whom to purchase votes (using fiat money from IOUs stashed in the "other people's" immense, completely devoid of honest accounting, and hopelessly complex, treasury). It was always only a matter of time before the parasites outnumbered the hosts.
America has committed suicide.
You are correct.
Everyone wants to blame them, they, he, it, “the system”, a conspiracy or just say that is just how the world is. But the world is made up of people, “the people” is made up of individuals... us!
Instead of trying to evade responsibility for the state of the world by waving a hand vaguely and dismissively, we should start by admitting that we are part of it. If we can admit that then we admit that we can change it, even if only in a small way.
Once we are rid of Obama in the White House, we can get back to blaming Bush, and maybe with Ryan in the picture, we can start fixing things. While it is the “economy stupid,” there is much more about Obama that makes him dangerous, not the least of which is the fact the media won’t investigate him. We need to dethrone the media god.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.