Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Red] Chinese manufacturing hits three-year low
The Telegraph ^ | 9/3/2012

Posted on 09/03/2012 1:09:18 AM PDT by bruinbirdman

China's manufacturing activity fell to its lowest level in more than three years in August as the global economic slowdown continues to weigh on the world's largest exporter, HSBC has said.

The final reading of the British banking giant's closely-watched purchasing managers' index (PMI), which gauges nationwide manufacturing activity, slid to 47.6 last month from 49.3 in July, HSBC said in a statement.

This was the lowest since March 2009 and marked the 10th consecutive monthly fall, the bank said. It chimed with the official PMI figure released at the weekend, which hit a nine-month low of 49.2.

A PMI reading above 50 indicates expansion, while one below 50 points to contraction.

HSBC economist Qu Hongbin said the figures showed China's manufacturing sector faced "intensifying downward pressure" and urged the government to step up easing measures.

"China's exporters are facing increasing difficulties amid stronger global headwinds," he said, adding new export orders contracted last month at the sharpest pace since March 2009 while employers cut jobs at the fastest rate in 41 months.

Authorities have tried to boost the economy with interest rate cuts and by lowering the amount of reserves that banks must keep on hand in a bid to spur the kind of lending that could stimulate

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china

1 posted on 09/03/2012 1:09:23 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

How can they be having 10% annual growth, a weak middle class, and collapsing exports?


2 posted on 09/03/2012 1:12:17 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
How can they be having 10% annual growth, a weak middle class, and collapsing exports?

Keynesian economics?

3 posted on 09/03/2012 1:15:10 AM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dangus

you could grow without exports


4 posted on 09/03/2012 1:24:00 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dangus; bruinbirdman
How can they be having 10% annual growth, a weak middle class, and collapsing exports?

We calculate GDP this way.

GDP is defined as C (consumption) + I (investment) + G government spending) + (x [exports] - i [imports]).

They calculate it like this.

GDP is defined as C (consumption) + I (investment) + G (government spending) + (x [goods produced] - i [imports].

Notice exports aren't included in their calculations.

5 posted on 09/03/2012 1:26:57 AM PDT by Doofer (Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Good catch, although of course “G” is the most fraudulent term. It’s based on borrowing, printing money out of thin air and deficit spending.


6 posted on 09/03/2012 1:30:28 AM PDT by agere_contra (Vote ABO. Don't choose the Greater Evil and then boast about how principled you are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Their biggest customer is broke.


7 posted on 09/03/2012 1:41:43 AM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

China will raise quality and prices for it’s products. There are no competitors anyway for 98% volume of consumer goods.


8 posted on 09/03/2012 1:50:20 AM PDT by cunning_fish (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

“Red” Chinese? Whadda ya mean? Doncha know that we ain’t s’posed to call commies “reds” anymore?

No, “red” is what we now are supposed to call Republicans!


9 posted on 09/03/2012 3:04:55 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
Good catch, although of course “G” is the most fraudulent term.

Correct...

10 posted on 09/03/2012 4:28:29 AM PDT by Doofer (Still, a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doofer
"GDP is defined as C (consumption) + I (investment) + G government spending) + (x [exports] - i [imports])."

The Chicoms calculate it as P (production) period. Sales (consumption) do not enter the calculation.

The Communists over-produce cement just about equal to total production outside Red China, yet they count it in GDP.

All those ghost cities? Included in GDP.

yitbos

11 posted on 09/03/2012 4:11:55 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson