Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Love Him. Hate Him. You Haven't a Clue.
American Thinker ^ | September 3, 2012 | J.T. Hatter

Posted on 09/03/2012 3:37:52 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Too bad Barry’s commie relatives aren’t around anymore to experience the fruits of their labors from their boy wonder. Instead its we reaping their rotten fruits while they’re long gone from the scene. We got stuck with their clown as a bunch of chumps. Barry’s deceased commie American relatives deserve a lot of post-humous scorn.


21 posted on 09/03/2012 5:01:19 AM PDT by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I have heard a few times the communists in Russia knew he would be POTUS years ago.


22 posted on 09/03/2012 5:11:55 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
"I have heard a few times the communists in Russia knew he would be POTUS years ago."

I think you're referring to this.

23 posted on 09/03/2012 5:22:39 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I’ve always believed that 0bama is really a fascist/nationalist socialist, as it fits him like a glove. A true hard core socialist would not be so comfortable around big corporations/big money as the teleprompter in chief is. But national socialist are, nazi’s were all for “public/private” partnerships, as long as they had the final say, and the “private” part paid its tribute to the party. Big corporatism is not for free markets, they are for who they bribe the most to get an advantage, and since they are so big, politicians pay attention. What Zero really hates is freedom, and small business operate in much more of a true, free market, you only make it if you work yourself, this is why he hates them so much, and they are much harder to control, and have true American ideals...


24 posted on 09/03/2012 5:23:57 AM PDT by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

He would never, ever pass a government background investigation. He isn’t cleared to read even confidential material much less top secret and above. This man is a national joke and disgrace.


25 posted on 09/03/2012 5:25:23 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (America: home of the free because of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machman
A true hard core socialist would not be so comfortable around big corporations/big money as the teleprompter in chief is.

Geez, the whole purpose of the socialists was to take over the businesses. After they did this, they ran into trouble with others farther down who wanted their piece of the pie, too.
26 posted on 09/03/2012 5:32:02 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
They were very close, as close as father and son. Obama called him "Pops" or "Frank."

I don't think that's quite the comparison:
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that I've got on mine, and
Makes me smell his smell, coming
From me

27 posted on 09/03/2012 5:37:39 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
to all....don't forget the islamic influence...

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

Video of Obama sucking up to the islamics...because he is one.

28 posted on 09/03/2012 6:09:20 AM PDT by spokeshave (The only people better off today than 4 years ago are the Prisoners at Guantanamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Just go see Dinesh D’Souza’s movie ‘Obama’s America: 2016” and you will learn this and much, much more.


29 posted on 09/03/2012 6:16:16 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Who Is Barack Obama?

I have a different story, that Obama was created and raised to be a deep cover CIA operative in the Kremlin.

Most people have never heard of “Operation Solo”, in which the FBI planted a mole in the American Communist Party, who was all-access in the Kremlin. The top Soviet leaders freely spoke in front of him, because they didn’t know that he spoke Russian fluently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Solo

This gives just an inkling of how serious the American intelligence community took the Cold War.

In any event, virtually everything Obama’s mother did was subsidized either directly by the US government, funded by a CIA front organization, or was controlled by corporations who were major parts of CIA operations.

Obama’s mother was a CIA spy. And what she voluntarily did, she did knowingly as a spy. She was not a puppet. When Obama’s mother was working, she was doing so at the administrative level right on the front lines of the Cold War.

Her father, Obama’s grandfather, was officially a “furniture salesman”, but there is a photo of him standing next to his young daughter, wearing a sweater with a distinctive patch on it. The patch is from a very expensive, elite French language school that was in Beirut, Lebanon. Students did not go there to learn French, but to sound like, have the accent of, an upper-class Frenchman.

Not a whole lot of furniture salesmen attend such schools.

But what of Obama himself?

He started out on the same track that his mother did, but with the intent that his “leftist credentials” were impeccable. And this is why his background is so blurry. No individual or group of radicals can perform personal history “surgery” like that. It was a very thorough, and very expensive cleaning. It *had* to have been done by the US government, as a continual process starting years before Obama entered politics.

An interesting thing about the radicals he worked with is that for the most part, they are still alive and not in prison. If you go down the list of serious radicals from the 1960’s, this in itself is extraordinary. Almost all their peers either ended up dead or in prison, but they got through it all without a scratch, and now have good, high paying jobs.

But with their radical leftist connections, communist friends, etc., Obama would have been a natural to attend Moscow University, in Russia, and be seen as a major player in the anti-American efforts by the Soviet leadership.

And then the Cold War ended by the Soviet Union falling apart.

So what to do with young Obama? A man trained to be an utterly cold-blooded, ruthless spy, seemingly a traitor to his country within the corridors of power of its enemy, where any error, any glitch, would result in his being executed.

The next part is extremely important: what is his motivation, really?

Was he brought up to be a ruthless anti-communist and anti-socialist, with the idea of utterly destroying it from within? There are many, many people who have sworn on their families graves to do everything in their power to destroy communism and socialism. They are as serious as a heart attack about it, even today.

As ridiculous as is sounds, is his intent to utterly ruin everything done by “progressivism” in most of the 20th Century? To kill the cancer by taking it over?

Or is this assuming too much, and is he just trying to steer America in the direction of tepid and ineffectual European-style socialist-democracy?

That’s the trouble with such blurry people. Only his handlers know for sure. But who are his handlers?


30 posted on 09/03/2012 6:36:11 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I believe that is the article and I am wondering why this was printed so late.


31 posted on 09/03/2012 6:45:13 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

But who are his handlers?

 

Dn't need n Weatherman t see which waybama's wind

blws.

 

"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"

--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20080637,00.html

"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."

Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1

"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."

Campus Wars: The Peace Movement At American State Universities in the Vietnam Era

 

"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left.  Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/predicting_the_weatherman.html

 

The Osawatomie Coincidence

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818309/posts


32 posted on 09/03/2012 6:47:20 AM PDT by OldEarlGray (The POTUS is FUBAR until the White Hut is sanitized with American Tea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; All

.

If America only knew....

The best Obama exposure site on the net:
(by our own FReeper, Beckwith)

The Obama File
http://theobamafile.com/

The United States Library of Congress has selected
TheObamaFile.com for inclusion in its historic collection
of Internet materials
http://theobamafile.com/LibraryOfCongress.html

Just a few of the pages:

http://www.theobamafile.com/index_next_politics.html

http://www.theobamafile.com/index_next_personal.html

http://www.theobamafile.com/BarackObama.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_family/FamilyPage.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaEducation.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaPsychology.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaReligion.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaWife.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/ObamaAssociates.htm

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaIconography.htm

.

.


33 posted on 09/03/2012 6:48:18 AM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Look at the date: 2008. This isn’t “late.”

There are loooong FR threads on 0 and his background. This stuff has been floating since well before the last election, but nobody’s listening.

FMD was a major influence, but there is no evidence whatsoever that there are bio ties. Shared marxism is enough.


34 posted on 09/03/2012 6:59:43 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

“He would never, ever pass a government background investigation. He isn’t cleared to read even confidential material much less top secret and above. This man is a national joke and disgrace.”

I completely agree with all of that.

But my greater concern is some of our elected officials allowed him in the White house, while others allow him to remain there.


35 posted on 09/03/2012 7:04:01 AM PDT by Backstop73 (Always reading, seldom posting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Geez, the whole purpose of the socialists was to take over the businesses. After they did this, they ran into trouble with others farther down who wanted their piece of the pie, too.

Zero doesn't want to necessarily take them over and have the state run them, he likes the illusion of being "pro-business", like I said, public/private partnerships....this quote from Hitler sums it up nicely.... "National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd ties with a democratic order.... Why need we trouble to socialize banks and factories? We socialize human beings"

36 posted on 09/03/2012 7:05:52 AM PDT by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: StevenFlorida

Obama , Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi?
They may be radical and socialist/marxist/communists but when it comes to their own wealth and comfort it’s a different story. Scumbuckets!


37 posted on 09/03/2012 7:17:45 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
This article pretty much factually brands Obama as a fascist (nationalist socialist), although the term is not used.

Yep.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008

They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps deserve) defense.

The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.

I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...

38 posted on 09/03/2012 8:44:07 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1323 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Watching 2016: Obama the Movie I saw a much greater resemblance between BO and his half-brother George (both having the same father - BO Sr.) than I do between FMD and BO Jr. Just saying.
39 posted on 09/03/2012 11:43:25 AM PDT by BufordP ("Drink me if you can't take a joke." --Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; All

Reminder:

A. Mitt Romney has stated his chief political mentor was his father, George Romney.

B. George Romney, a steadfast progressive, credited Saul Alinsky, met with him, and recommended his work.

A+B = Mitt Romney’s chief political mentor was a steadfast progressive who credited Saul Alinsky, met with him, and recommended his work.
http://gulagbound.com/25499/mitt-romneys-mentor-his-father-a-fan-of-saul-alinsky/

Newt apparently brought it to the fore...or at least he’s given the credit by the marxistmedia.

Alinsky was also a mentor to Hlllary along with Obama but who was Alinsky’s mentor - aside from Lucifer...

Black Liberation Theology, the Weather Underground etc, Anti-Colonism, Nationalism etc, Crony Capitalism and so on...all work together.

Sein Fein was a Nationalist Terrorist Anti-Colonial Group who just wanted an All-Ireland, the Provincial IRA was/is all of them together...the Provos trained bands of radicals all over the world including Palestine, S America...Most people get suckered into radical bandits like this for a single objective only, for example, a United Ireland, being completely unaware of their major purpose. The commies trained the Provo’s.


40 posted on 09/03/2012 12:12:36 PM PDT by bronxville ( Obama "The true engine of economic growth will always be companies like Solyndra")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson