Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lancey Howard
Given the overwhelming rat control of the House for the entirety of Reagan's 8 years, and rat control of the Senate for all but 2 years, it is truly amazing what Reagan was able to accomplish

The republicans did not lose the Senate until 1986, six years after Reagan took office.

Incidentally, the effect of party control of the Senate is a better predictor of stock market performance than control of the White House or House of Representatives.

10 posted on 09/03/2012 11:49:41 AM PDT by Castlebar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Castlebar
The republicans did not lose the Senate until 1986, six years after Reagan took office.

I sit corrected. Thank you.

Regardless, the rats controlled the House convincingly, and that's where "Ways and Means" happens. Also, the GOP senate included a pile of liberal, go-along-get-along Republicans at the time. Weicker, Chafee, Specter, Rudman, Stafford, Hatfield, Andrews, and Lugar just for starters. Half of the rest were squishy at best. That was one pathetic "Republican" senate. In retrospect, it's amazing Reagan got done what he did.

12 posted on 09/03/2012 2:09:40 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson