Discord, based on perspective, in the subjective, soft “sciences” is to be expected.
There is less room for opinion in the objective, hard sciences (physics, chemistry, biology, etc.).
The epithelial lining of the rectum is composed of simple columnar cells. The function of this type of epithelium is absorption of moisture. It does not provide protection from repeated friction. The resulting epithelial tears are conducive to the transmission of sexually transmitted disease.
The lining of the vagina is composed of stratified squamous cells, well suited to repeated friction.
The above is anatomical fact, not opinion based on faith, bigotry, or politics.
It matters not if such deviancy is genetic or learned behavior.
If we were to allow the SSADs (Same Sex Attraction Disorder) to frame the issue like we always seem to do, then the following can also be said:
1) If a person is genetically predisposed or has learned to steal does it make a difference and should we allow one to steal but the other to be arrested?
2) If a person is genetically predisposed or has learned to molest young children does it make a difference and should we allow one to molest but the other to be arrested? Remember that within the phony Psycho profession, there is a move afoot to redefine child molesters as simply suffering from an “age inappropriate desire disorder”. Oh my, how nice.
3) If a person is genetically predisposed or has learned to kill does it make a difference and should we allow one to kill but the other to be arrested?
NO, of course not because real civilized humans have the capacity to ignore or suppress wants and desires which civilization has deemed wrong.
What the SSADs are trying to do is make wrong right. Thanks to a very willing progressive media, and in large part to progressive unionized public schools, deviant behavior is now considered nothing more than a choice.
Well I saw a very nice car today I would love to have but because I do not believe my want constitutes a right to take that car I simply appreciated from afar.
To SSADs, prove to us that you are civilized humans and suppress your deviant desires.
The same thing happens to any researcher who would dare to scientifically investigate theories on intelligent or who would point out the empirical shortcomings of the theory of Darwinism. They generally get drummed out of the academic community. The libs love of science ends as soon as anyone would use it in a manner that threatenes their sacred preconceptions.
Matt Barber tells it like it is. Perhaps the vindication of Regnerus will become a new trend, reversing the tyranny of gay science.