Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sandra Fluke: Ryan's Abortion Position Kills Women (Video)
breitbart.com ^ | 09-04-2012 | Staff

Posted on 09/04/2012 7:06:00 PM PDT by bronxville

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: TigersEye

This is not a zero sum game. An abortion = 100% guarantee of a death. A high risk pregnancy that is not aborted does NOT = 100% guarantee of death. Ensuring that there is NO abortion under any circumstances is the only way we can truly be pro life, and ensure that our position promotes more life than any alternate position.

Hope that makes sense.


61 posted on 09/05/2012 3:11:34 PM PDT by SAR (Son of THE Revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SAR

It doesn’t make any sense and has nothing to do with any “case” that I made.


62 posted on 09/05/2012 3:28:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SAR
{{{crickets chirping}}}

That's what I expected.

63 posted on 09/05/2012 9:58:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: All
"Abortion" for the life of the mother was legal in all 50 states before Roe v. Wade.

I put "abortion" in quotes because the procedure to save a woman's life when a pregnancy presents life threatening medical complications it is not considered an abortion in medical terms. In those situations the doctors will do everything they can to save both lives.

If the fetus is too young to save by any known method the medical battle for its life is already lost and the doctors won't waste time trying to do what they cannot do. That doesn't in any way imply that they made a moral or ethical decision to favor the mother's life over the baby's life. It's a simple recognition of the technical limitations of medicine.

If the fetus is old enough to potentially be saved then the ethical dilemma is the same as that of any triage situation. It is hoped that both patients can be saved but if time and technical abilities create limits that proscribe any reasonable chance of saving both patients then the one with the best chance of survival is the one they focus on. That would almost always be the mother. The chances that a situation would present where the fetus could be saved and the mother could not would be almost zero and has most likely never happened.

In an abortion there is never any intention to save the baby. The very purpose of abortion in the first place is to kill the baby. The baby is never considered a patient in an abortion.

64 posted on 09/07/2012 9:29:38 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson