Posted on 09/04/2012 9:01:47 PM PDT by i88schwartz
Charles Krauthammer: Her whole task was to say why. And her answer was, Why? Because essentially he's a saint. Because of his upbringing and because of his emotions and because of his humanity. He does of this because he cares. And the brilliance of it is this: It drained Obama of any, either, ideological motivation, or any having to do with self interest or ambition, which I think is sort of a more plausible explanation.
He's a man highly who is liked and highly ideological. A man of the left who sees the role of the government as ordering, the reorderering, of society in a way to make it more just, as he understands it . And also, extremely ambitious. A self made man who makes himself out of nothing, rises out of nowhere. But all of that, in her telling, doesnt even exist. The only reason he does what he does, he cares about women, he cares about immigrants, he cares about the poor. He cares about the unemployed. He cares, he cares, he cares.
She told the story of a Gandhi. And, you know, looking at the scene, looking at how he's conducted himself in the presidency and particularly in the campaign, with ruthlessness and determination and drive, its not quite a plausible story. Im sure in the arena, it was a plausible story. I saw the tears, but Im afraid, I thought it was a great speech, but I didn't buy a line of it.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
“She told the story of a Gandhi.”
What was Gandhi’s handicap? And how often did he vacation on Martha’s Vineyard?
[[[Eye saw watt ewe did their.]]]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.