Possibly. Reference please.
Churches don't even have to marry people of their own church if they don't meet qualifications. For instance, the Catholics won't perform a marriage for a divorced Catholic unless he goes thru the (often more or less sham) process of getting an annulment.
Actually, annulment a forensic canonical proocess involving a formal investigation and a judge. It's not at all a sham. The very procedural gravity of it is why some people resent it (and some highly value it.) It provides a perspective of objectivity that people in difficult marriage situations often need.
It' such "grave matter" that if one party or the other doesn't think the result is 100% legitimate, they can appeal it to Rome. Rome doesn't mess with local diocesan stuff unless it's serious.
And nobody can be denied an investigation of nullity because of lack of money. The process takes time and investigators and judges incur expenses; but if a person can't afford it, it's to be done at no cost.
It's rarely a sham these days.
That's for two reasons:
(1) The rules are being more strictly followed (my wife's cousin went through an extensive process despite the fact that her first marriage met exactly none of the criteria for a Catholic marriage) and
(2) Probably 50% of Catholic marriages or more involve spouses who have defective intent.
It is very difficult to argue that Ted Kennedy or Joan Kennedy, who was raised in Riverdale in the 1940s and went to Sacred Heart, did not understand and agree to the conditions of a valid Catholic marriage.
Thanks to "the spirit of the Council" very few young Catholics are versed in Casti Connubi.