To: Perdogg
What about 48 monthly jobs reports?...............
2 posted on
09/07/2012 11:05:46 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Anyone who thinks wisdom comes with age is either too young or too stupid to know the difference....)
To: Red Badger
4 years of soundbites are available, and if the Romney campaign puts together a regular montage of ‘recovery’, ‘turning the corner’, ‘can’t look at just one month’, etc, this election is won. It shows complete incompetence.
5 posted on
09/07/2012 11:09:02 AM PDT by
ilgipper
To: Red Badger
Yeah, exactly. This is precisely what R&R ought to be saying — “I agree with the White House, we shouldn’t read too much into a single monthly jobs report . . . but I read a lot into 36 straight monthly jobs reports and that is, this President’s policies are a failure and we need to change, and quickly.”
8 posted on
09/07/2012 11:10:28 AM PDT by
USNA74
To: Red Badger
“What about 48 monthly jobs reports?”
Exactly what I was thinking.
I’m sure some sharp media type will ask that Ques.............nevermind
12 posted on
09/07/2012 11:12:01 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: Red Badger
My exact first thought. Hey buddy, what about the last 48 months of jobs reports? If you say so, then how about we look at of them stacked up! Sheesh.
21 posted on
09/07/2012 11:18:26 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(The Hunger Games -- Obama's vision for America)
To: Red Badger
It’s not important to read too much into 48 consecutive monthly job reports. If it gets to 53 and Mitt Romney is President, that’ll be when it’s important.
37 posted on
09/07/2012 11:58:24 AM PDT by
Personal Responsibility
(Behind enemy lines in the city where it's illegal to buy a Big Gulp)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson