Posted on 09/07/2012 1:36:46 PM PDT by Entrepreneur
The country is currently holding a national debate on tax rates. Contractors and other small business owners should pay attention. It’s like you debating whether to change your sales commission structure. That would matter for your salespeople. This matters for you.
The business incentive effect: Personal taxes have a strong impact on businesses because so many small businesses pay taxes as individuals if organized as an S-Corp, Limited Liability Corporation, or partnership (which pass business earnings through to the individual). This can create the appearance that a business owner has a high income. The truth is they actually pay themselves modest salaries and reinvest earnings in their business.
A study by Ernst & Young noted, “The increase in the top two income tax rates would directly affect nearly one million pass-through business owners, while another 1.2 million business owners earn enough to pay the top two rates, but are subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax instead.” That represents a significant number of the six million small businesses with a payroll, per the SBA.
Business owners may pay themselves a salary, but they really work on commission. The commission is the profitability of the company. Raising taxes lowers the commission. Think of the motivational effect you will achieve if you cut commissions on your salespeople. Raising taxes accomplishes the same for business owners. This is why the Ernst & Young study found that increasing marginal rates would result in fewer jobs, lower wages, less investment, and a smaller economy.
The Federal revenue effect: Since World War II, tax receipts as a percent of GDP have hovered in a narrow band between 16% and 20%, regardless of the marginal tax rates! Throughout the 1950s, the top marginal rate was 91%. Receipts averaged 17% of GDP.
The Kennedy tax cuts pulled rates down to 70%. After some fluctuation in the 1960s, rates were largely kept at 70% throughout the 1970s. Receipts averaged 18%.
The Reagan tax cuts pulled rates from 70% to 28% over the course of the 1980s. Receipts averaged 18%.
In 1990, GHW Bush raised marginal income taxes to 31%. In 1993, Clinton raised them to 39.6%. Receipts in the 1990s averaged 18%.
George W. Bush lowered marginal rates to 38.6% in 2001 and 35% in 2003, where they remain today. Tax receipts from 2000 through 2009 averaged 18%.
Do you see the pattern? When taxes go up, people find ways to legally avoid them and/or reduce their economic activity. Marginal investments become less attractive and aren’t made. Economic activity slows. When taxes are cut, more people get in the game, more investments are made, and the economy expands, generating greater tax receipts.
The corporate tax effect: Our corporate taxes are in even worse shape than personal taxes. They are the highest in the developed world. The highest! According to the accounting firm KPMG, combined Federal (35%) and state corporate taxes are 40%.
How does this compare? Canada and England are 26%. Germany is 29.48%. Communist China is 25%. Russia is 20%. France is 33.33%. Sweden is 26.3%. The European average is 20.6%. The global average is less than 24.47%
Many countries realize that tax policy affects investment, growth, and prosperity. This explains why most of them make their tax policy more business friendly. Of the countries that changed corporate tax rates since 2005, 78% lowered rates.
Strip ideology from the debate and there’s no debate at all. Empirically, it’s clear. Cutting taxes would increase economic growth, result in job formation, boost prosperity, and make America more competitive, while simultaneously increasing net government receipts.
There simply is no economic argument to be made for raising taxes.
Top Tax Rate = 91% & Receipts/GDP = 17%
Top Tax Rate = 70% & Receipts/GDP = 18%
Top Tax Rate = 28% & Receipts/GDP = 18%
Top Tax Rate = 40% & Receipts/GDP = 18%
Top Tax Rate = 35% & Receipts/GDP = 18%
There simply is no economic argument to be made for raising taxes.
Duh. Democrat arguments aren’t really about deficits, revenue, and GDP. They’re about fairness. Or whatever argument helps soak the rich without endangering the beloved middle class, which just so happens to outvote other classes.
You're right, of course. But those calling for tax hikes don't give a rat's behind about economics. They insist that businesspeople will just work harder to make up for the lost income.
We've seen, over the last four years, that even the threat of higher taxes will dry up new business activity.
“There simply is no economic argument to be made for raising taxes.”
Somebody asked Obama about this and he responded, “It’s not about taxes, it’s about fairness.”
Because it’s always fair to take someone else’s money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.