Posted on 09/08/2012 6:52:51 PM PDT by Orange1998
Edited on 09/08/2012 7:23:11 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
‘Has he given any specifics yet on what federal spending he WILL cut?”
That might be because he wants to win.
Correct. This is NOT a dig on Ryan.
The “Cut, Cap and balance” plan was the House position to implement cut, cap and balance. That had the Ryan budget.
The Boehner/McConnell/Reid sausage that was made in Aug 2011 was NOT Ryan budget, not even close. It was a big punt to 2013 -— the fiscal cliff we now face because of the failure to cut $2 trillion out of the budget.
Romney said he’s against cutting $1 trillion from government spending because HE THINKS its cutting $1 trillion from the economy
Where were you last spring? FR was filled with angry posters, including JimRob, echoing what Romney’s saying here: the super committee was a dumb idea.
You mean the same Mitt Romney who came out early in support of Cut, Cap & Balance?
Oh my - do you have an Obama sticker on your car yet? Mitt was correct and Ryan was pushing for a real budget that the Dims will not let happen. Would you rather he had voted “present”?
Nice to agree with Romney on something.
Glad to hear Aiken did not support this deal. I remember when I found out at the time that Allen West supported it. I was very disappointed.
The only Americans in Syria are our troops and support staff.
John McCain is a maniac and so is his little buddy Graham and McConnell is as much a dolt as Boehner.
Sorry. Should read:
The only Americans in Afghanistan are our troops and support staff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.