Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New school nutrition standards a recipe for problems? (lesson in why local control is best)
Reading Eagle ^ | 9/9/12 | Reading Eagle

Posted on 09/08/2012 10:48:08 PM PDT by newzjunkey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Time to flip the tables, it's not dastardly Republicans but the Queen of Food Police, Michelle Obama, starving our children.

This is why local control is critical, not mandates from D.C., not tax money being laundered through the Washington central planners and returned with strings attached.

1 posted on 09/08/2012 10:48:11 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

And if indeed a student has not eaten all weekend, should the parents not be contacted?

Because in my book that is child neglect.


2 posted on 09/08/2012 10:57:35 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

This country is really going down the tubes. It seems that now we don’t even expect parents to feed their children.


3 posted on 09/08/2012 11:00:58 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Isn’t a high protein diet good for you?

Fruits are FULL of sugar, grains are FULL of carbs (which are sugars, of course)l veggies are good, of course.

What’s wrong with proteins? I thought a high protein low carb diet was good for you.

Oh, it’s like everyone has gotten so stupid, I just can’t deal with it.

I’m glad I’m the age I am, the end of my life is no longer out of sight. I won’t mind leaving this realm of the moronic.


4 posted on 09/08/2012 11:03:51 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

yes it is neglect ..but i know teachers who send food home with kids at their own expense because they know the kids wong have food at home. parents sell food stamps or food from food stamps for drugs or cigaretts; that sort of thing.


5 posted on 09/08/2012 11:04:43 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

exactly..and most nutritionist are fat and telling everyone else how to eat. most of the food they give the kids at school I would not have in my house. its junk. processed junk.


6 posted on 09/08/2012 11:08:09 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

High protein diets are essential for kids.


7 posted on 09/08/2012 11:12:02 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

So at my son’s school this year, they got rid of ranch dressing because they said it was not a healthy choice. But guess what??? Now NONE of the kids are choosing salad or carrots or broccoli, because there is no dip!!!!! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!


8 posted on 09/08/2012 11:13:46 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Barry, Barry quite contrary, how does your government grow?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Odd. I would have thought that with obesity being the main health concern for children, complete elimination of the school lunch program would be indicated.


9 posted on 09/08/2012 11:35:09 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Our local school district sent a note home two-weeks ago about starting up MO’s “starve-your-kid-at-school” lunch program. Our 1st grader was so disgusted by what the cafeteria is now serving (or isn’t serving) that he insists that we pack his lunch everyday, which I’m more than happy to do.


10 posted on 09/08/2012 11:36:35 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
In his gut, Kurt Myers knows when a student arrives at school on an empty stomach. He can see it on a cold Monday morning in the coat that remains zipped and the hat that stays pulled down, in the rush to eat school breakfast as if it's the student's first meal in days.

In an era as refined as ours, when good manners, and fine breeding are a given, when every boy is well versed in table manners and restraint, to witness such a display, is truly evidence of starvation and good breeding overcome by base need.

11 posted on 09/08/2012 11:54:35 PM PDT by ansel12 ( Aug. 27, 2012-Mitt Romney said his views on abortion are more lenient than the Republican Platform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Truly hungry people eat whatever food comes their way, yes, even the dreaded vegetables.


12 posted on 09/09/2012 12:17:50 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; All
Our 1st grader was so disgusted by what the cafeteria is now serving (or isn’t serving) that he insists that we pack his lunch everyday, which I’m more than happy to do.

You're fortunate that's allowed in your area.

We've already seen a Chicago-area school ban packed lunches and North Carolina schools inspecting home-brought lunches for nutritional content and requiring purchase of replacement items.

13 posted on 09/09/2012 2:02:55 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Election night is 59 days away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skr

Exactly. There wasn’t much “obesity” at Bergen-Belsen, Dachau, the Siberian Gulags, the Japanese prisoner cages or Luft Stalags, was there? If you saw a scrap of any kind of food, you’d jump for it.


14 posted on 09/09/2012 2:42:07 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Local control is only part of it. Knowing the school will feed their children, those on welfare will spend their state stipend on other things besides food. Welfare has destroyed a good portion of our society.


15 posted on 09/09/2012 4:30:44 AM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Persevero
And if indeed a student has not eaten all weekend, should the parents not be contacted? Because in my book that is child neglect.

Exactly. The parents must be getting "food stamps" so what are they doing with them? Buying lottery tickets, booze, or whatever else they can get away with?

It all boils downs to obama not wanting to mess with his base. "You doan wanna go to the trouble a feeding yo chillun? Thass OK. We doot for you."

16 posted on 09/09/2012 4:40:15 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Actually, the article points out that this is true even for the kids who pay full price for their lunches.

It makes sense for schools to offer food on the premises, because it’s generally not possible for kids to leave the building to buy something, and some of them simply don’t like sandwiches. School food has never been great, but in the past, at least there was something they could buy that would get them through the day.

Michelle’s bizarre idea that kids are supposed to survive on vegetables alone is ridiculous and harmful to them. Maybe the next step is eating grass, the way the North Koreans do. For everybody except Moochelle, of course.


17 posted on 09/09/2012 5:13:24 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Yeah, I followed the NC story closely back in the spring but missed the Chicago story. What ticks me off is all the stupid parents who think that it's a good idea to ban packed lunches and go along with the statists.

Sheep, all of them!

18 posted on 09/09/2012 5:46:51 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Pack his lunch while you still can...you do know that the next step will likely be to ban that practice.


19 posted on 09/09/2012 6:28:58 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Our only Hope is Obama's Change.........of Address!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: livius
Maybe the next step is eating grass, the way the North Koreans do. For everybody except Moochelle, of course.

If Obama is reelected - count on it.

20 posted on 09/09/2012 6:31:08 AM PDT by Mygirlsmom (Our only Hope is Obama's Change.........of Address!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson