[Bobloblaw2012]

“”Exactly as it should be. If a party and/or candidate cannot convincingly make their case to the electorate””

So the reason no GOP candidate, except Arnold, has won statewide in CA since 1994, is all because they were bad candidates? All of them? Tom McClintock a bad candidate?? It is because CA is liberal and no GOP candidate regardless of ideology, competence or achievement can over come it.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

Exactly as it should be. If a party and/or candidate cannot convincingly make their case to the electorate -- particularly after six full years of campaigning, in Mittens' increasingly limp case -- then the fault for that absolutely lies with them, and them alone.

So the reason no GOP candidate, except Arnold, has won statewide in CA since 1994, is all because they were bad candidates?

Re-read what was originally posted -- particularly the portion emphasized in bright red, this time -- and try again.