Posted on 09/11/2012 8:02:05 AM PDT by ednoonan7
CNN Commits Birth Certificate Fraud To Cover For Obama’s Constitutional Ineligibility
Posted by Pamela Barnett - 11 September 2012
CNN states on their program that a picture of a real Hawaii birth certificate is Obama’s when it belongs to a Japanese-American (possibly Keith Suganuma) child born in 1960 to a father Francis (possibly last name Suganuma), 42, who was a police officer and a mother Mildred, 20. Please review screen shots from CNN’s video and help fill in the rest of the pieces. I think the mother’s middle and maiden names may be Kazuo and Yashiki respectively.
Notice that CNN would not even post the forged birth certificate at whitehouse.gov. They had to “borrow” a real Hawaii birth certificate to pass off as aka Obama’s.
The media has been engaging in fraud – possibly criminal fraud, as they are to be named in a RICO complaint soon regarding Obama’s ineligibility and the pursuing cover-up. Abbercrombie should be put up for a Razzie for his laughable acting performance.
Read more at: http://obamaballotchallenge.com/cnn-commits-birth-certificate-fraud-to-cover-for-obamas-constitutional-ineligibility
(Excerpt) Read more at obamaballotchallenge.com ...
“So now we have another fraudulent graphic to add to our collection; are you proud?”
1. Obama was the one who presented a fraudulent birth certificate.
2. The graphic I posted is not fraudulent.
Because of the persisting controversy about his eligibility, On April 27, 2011 the Office of the President at the White House released a document that is called “Long-Form Birth Certificate”. The release of this simple document, after two years of controversy, raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document. To check this, we downloaded the document that was posted at the White House site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.
The analyses presented below reveal without a doubt that the Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama is a fabricated, fake and forged document.
The publication of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.
Moreover, the lack of action on the part of the members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate, as well as the courts of the United States, despite many previous appeals to these three branches of American government, also raise a concern about how the governmental institutions of the reputedly best, and certainly the most important democracy in the Free World have avoided this issue.
Analysis of the document using Foxit Reader
A PDF document can be read by many different type of programs freely available. Here we used Foxit Reader version 4.3.1 that can be downloaded from the Foxit web site.
Instructions to check the document:
Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
Open the PDF document using Foxit Reader.
Zoom into the document 800%. Scroll down until you see the serial number of the document “61 1064” in the top right-hand side of the document. In full page view the number appears as “61 10641”. But, after magnification, the last digit “1” disappears! This last digit is also in a font that is different from the other digits. This is only one example. Many more examples can be discovered by examining magnified document with full page view of the document.
In brief, this simple analysis using just a viewing software reveals that the PDF document has been doctored by a graphics software.
Analysis of the document using Inkscape, a vector graphics software.
Reservations could be raised about the results of imaging by Foxit Reader noted above. As an independent test of the composition of the “Long-Form Birth Certificate” of Obama, the PDF file was also examined by an open source freely available Inkscape (version 0.48.1) graphics software.
Instructions to check the document:
Download the document from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
Import the PDF document using Inkscape. Unmark the two options in order not to modify the document.
In vector graphics software, an image is composed of elements. If the “Long-Form Birth Certificate” of Obama was a photocopied document then it should not be composed of separate parts. To reveal if the document has parts, click on the image opened. The status line at the bottom of the software reports that the image is composed of “2 objects” that have been grouped.
To “ungroup” image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup.
For a second time, again click on the image and to “ungroup” image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. The status line at the bottom of the program reports that the image includes 9 objects.
Again click on the image and for a third time to “ungroup” image components click Ctrl-Shift-G or select Object>Ungroup. This time you see the outlines of nine rectangles marking the boundaries of the 9 objects.
The most important object among the 9 objects that are revealed is shown below.
http://www.science.co.il/Obama-Birth-Certificate.htm
(2)I notice that Dr. Fukino (the former head of the Hawaii Health Dept.) appears in person in this video, saying she has personally seen the original Obama birth certificate and that she has no doubt he was born in Hawaii. Naturally, CNN makes much ado over the fact that Fukino is a Republican, but I believe Fukino became a Republican as a matter of convenience to work for Lingle. It should be noted that Fukino is not under oath when she interviews with CNN.
(3)CNN tries to make a big issue of the short form Hawaii "Certification of Live Birth" (which Obama displayed in 2008) stating that is "prima facie evidence of birth in any court proceeding." But "prima facie" evidence can be overcome by other, more substantive and more credible evidence, such as definitive proof that the certificate is a fraud. In other words, CNN is trying to fool the gullible who don't understand what "prima facie" means.
(4)The end of the video cuts off abruptly, for whatever reason in the middle of an interview with a current Hawaii newspaper man, who denies that it would be impossible for Obama's grandparents to have phoned in the Obama birth announcement in the Star Bulletin. CNN is again fooling its audience into believing that a current newspaperman would have expertise as to what the procedures in use 50 years ago were. Furthermore, we get no rebuttal of the possibility that Obama's family, having learned of his out of state or foreign birth, could have registered that birth with the Hawaii Health Dept. (in accordance with Hawaii law) from whence the newspaper received the information for the announcement. Nor is there a rebuttal of the possibility that what we see in the newspaper birth announcement may have been forged long after the 1961 newspaper was published.
Not fraudulent?
Perhaps you don’t understand the word?
It is fraudulent.
From comments at http://obamaballotchallenge.com/cnn-commits-birth-certificate-fraud-to-cover-for-obamas-constitutional-ineligibility.
Child is Alan K Suganuma now age 50
Mildred Kazue Suganuma mother
Francis M Suganuma age 95 father
Someone should contact Alan Suganuma to see if he knows CNN used his birth certificate on national TV.
“The media has been engaging in fraud – possibly criminal fraud, as they are to be named in a RICO complaint soon regarding Obama’s ineligibility and the pursuing cover-up.”
A RICO complaint? Is this possibly real, or just someone’s fantasy. Actually, it would be great if it were true, and it could get legs and go forward.
Astonishing that they should lie like that. Thanks for posting this. Do they think we’re blind?
No, but they think most of the voters watching their show are. I tend to think they may be right.
>> But, after magnification, the last digit “1” disappears! This last digit is also in a font that is different from the other digits.
Hell, I’ve been saying that for years now. It was so obvious. Downward hooking serifs on the one digits to the left, a modern concave serif on the one digit to the right. Not to mention the various forms of image sampling.
A mechanical stamp produced the left numbers. The numbers on the right were created photographically or digitally, likely the latter.
There’s no complicated forensics here. It’s plain as day.
That's it? Your lib masters are not happy with your pathetic childish reply. And you were trying so hard to be smart... rotflmao
I understand the word.
The birth certificate Obama presented is fraudulent.
My prior post proved it.
There are two Alan K Suganuma in the USA. One in Hawaii with what appears to be the parents still alive. The other in Florida who patented software to teach music mathmatically. Either these guys are more of hussien’s ficticious composites or CNN should be facing a law suit.
Funny, how we can’t get a copy of hussein’s already publicized bc from HI and have vexatious requestor laws made but CNN can get this guy’s bc and have an HI official interviewed.
Sorry, hit the button too fast. I only did a quick yahoo people search for “Alan K Suganuma” so there may be others out there.
The press is the enemy of our Republic. And I read somewhere that nearly all the press people pay NO income taxes, or they are cheating on their income taxes. PRESS PEOPLE ===PAY YOUR TAXES ! You will be turned in!
Especially that Wolf Blitzer cheater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.