Failure of a host nation to stop a pre-planned mob attack upon an embassy constitutes an act of war.
The Flag of the United States was allowed to fall into enemy hands without casualties to defend it. Why? If the Ambassador does not wish to utilize deadly force to defend the soil of the United States Embassy and the nation’s symbolic flag, then why should the American taxpayers permit any further expenditures for a U.S. Marine Corps security detail which is denied to fulfill their mission?
Obama and his girlfriends will accuse us of being “alarmist.”
And as Mark Steyn would reply, “If this doesn’t alarm you, then nothing will.”
According to one article I read, supposedly, the diplomatic staff had been removed prior to the attack. They had been forewarned of a demonstration by protestors. The article also said “U.S. security guards” fired a volley of shots as a warning to the crowds outside the wall. Wouldn’t those guards have been Marines? Haven’t heard anything about any further shots being fired, and it appears none were if the scumbags were able to breach the wall and take down our flag. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if they replaced our Marines with muzzie guards.