Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS: Agents Won't Be Enforcers of Obamacare Mandate
Reuters via CNBC ^ | 11 Sep 2012 | staff reporter

Posted on 09/12/2012 7:10:51 AM PDT by Daffynition

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: FastCoyote

The 2012 election just became the most important in our lifetime, and the stakes just went through the roof, IMO this may be our *last* election.


41 posted on 09/12/2012 8:46:18 AM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
http://heartland.org/policy-documents/implementing-patient-protection-and-affordable-care-act

This Heartland Institute policy paper undermines their argument.

42 posted on 09/12/2012 8:51:54 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

You can’t ignore them, but you can tell them that you know the law and tell them to G- F-— themselves...


“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.”
Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).


January 30, 2005 Contact: Bob Schulz
For Immediate Release (518) 656-3578

U.S. Court of Appeals Rules IRS Cannot Apply Force
Against a Tax Payer Without A Court Order

Taxpayers Free To Ignore An IRS Summons

Queensbury, NY – On January 25, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that taxpayers cannot be compelled by the IRS to turn over personal and private property to the IRS, absent a federal court order.

Quoting from the decision (Schulz v. IRS, case number 04-0196-cv), “...absent an effort to seek enforcement through a federal court, IRS summonses apply no force to taxpayers, and no consequence whatever can befall a taxpayer who refuses, ignores, or otherwise does not comply with an IRS summons until that summons is backed by a federal court order…[a taxpayer] cannot be held in contempt, arrested, detained, or otherwise punished for refusing to comply with the original IRS summons, no matter the taxpayer’s reasons, or lack of reasons for so refusing.”

read the rest here:
http://whiz.to/~papera/Articles/IRS%20Summons.html


43 posted on 09/12/2012 9:00:45 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

First off, you are known liars.

Second, you will absolutely do as Congress mandates by law and you have ObamaCare to compel you, the same as many other laws.


44 posted on 09/12/2012 9:28:08 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

45 posted on 09/12/2012 9:34:03 AM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Excellence
Nice find. THX. We a reaping what was sown; One of the Worst Supreme Court Decisions in American History :(
46 posted on 09/12/2012 9:36:49 AM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

We need to get the names and and other information on the witnesses who testified under oath that the IRS would not be involved. There needs to be some perjury prosecutions in the future.


47 posted on 09/12/2012 12:41:09 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
Bullshit.

The Kenyan must go.

48 posted on 09/12/2012 3:38:45 PM PDT by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Jan. 2013, this didn’t take long:

IRS Warns Employers: Do Not Try to Avoid ObamaCare Insurance Mandate

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2976728/posts


49 posted on 01/10/2013 12:18:54 PM PST by lowbridge (Joe Biden: "Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

They had to pass the law for us to be able to know how it was going to screw us.


50 posted on 01/10/2013 12:54:08 PM PST by Delta Dawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

H&R Block is on board.

http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7wr7/h-and-r-block-free-tax-and-health-care-review


51 posted on 01/10/2013 1:01:31 PM PST by Daffynition (Self-respect: the secure feeling that no one, as yet, is suspicious. ~ HLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson