Posted on 09/13/2012 10:06:08 AM PDT by Lakeshark
I just wanted to take a moment to draw your attention to this particular op-ed, because… dang. Former Bush-administration State Department official Liz Cheney is going straight for the jugular with this one, and it is as damning an account of President Obama’s foreign policy failures as I’ve read.
**snip**
As Cheney points out, most of President Obama’s dealings on the international stage have been nothing short of a string of groveling apologies and attempts to weaken America and fall back to everybody else’s impuissant level, instead of us telling them what’s up, because apparently we don’t have to “moral authority” to do so. Wow.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
:-)
Obama does have a clue, he needs a “crisis” to justify him staying in office, taking away more constitutional rights, and extorting taxpayers’ money for his own enjoyment. As far as I can tell, the right will be only going more solidy anyone but Obama, and will only continue to do so.
:-(
Ugh. I love his one and only accomplishment: Sarah....... but this guy needs to go away.
Can we rid ourselves of Juan and his disgusting little clump of DNA, finally?
I youse spelcheque!
I have a lot of respect for Liz Cheney. She’s smart and calls it like it is and backs it up. I can see her in a high-level cabinet post.
The Obama Muslim Outreach is now exposed as what it always was, appeasement. Obama came back from his world tour and touted Peace in our Time.
Now it’s time for Churchill’s bust to return to the White House together with the arrival of a new President.
BUMP to your post!
I didn’t know that ...thanks.... /not sarcasm.
Obama Administration = The short bus of foreign policy.
I had to look that word up but it's a perfect description of Obama and his Democrats conduct of America's foreign policy and in particular the Obama Regime response to what has happened in Libya and Egypt. I'm incorporating it into my already vast vocabulary ;) ..
Right on. Right on!
Somehow, RINOmney must view this and learn how to take it to Zero.
Somehow, Cheney ended up with a higher ball-count than Romney.
Romney managed to link the Resident’s apologize before we do right policy with the attacks, and even if his timing was off, he was after all talking about a backwards policy so why not a backwards time sequence?
By the way, three and a half years he shall hold authority? Hmmm ... where have I read that before?
That signifies a grasp of world events and intelligence that I don’t believe Obama and his cohorts posses, sorry. Nope, I’m leaning towards ‘clueless’ when it comes to the world stage. That being said, will the administration use any tragedy (real or imagined) to advance their own agenda? Of course.
THAT is the headline I wanted to get from Romney.
That seems all too easy to do.
Watch 2016 and it will all make sense. Zero knows exactly what he is doing.
No, what Romney did was weak, very weak. He criticized the embassy and said he agreed with the President’s decision to walk it back. Not going to cut in Mitt. He needs to tie the events directly to Obama’s policies. Cheney is more credible on this because he’s being saying that Obama is wrong all along but Romney should still do it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.