First, Romney is accused of being too soft; not willing to aggressively tackle the tough issues. And then, when he calls out Obama on his unforgivable Libyan debacle, Mitts accused of politicizing deaths and not being presidential. Hmm, if I recall, countless Democratic politicians and liberal news outlets ran daily death counts from the Iraq War & Occupation as their devout followers orchestrated monthly protests over a mere 4,500 casualties, barely over a thousand at the time, to incessantly bash Bush and increase their election chances. Naturally, in their infinite wisdom and objectivity, they failed to mention these totals which were extremely low considering the duration, danger, and success of the campaign paled in comparison to the death counts of single day, Civil War battles that were predominantly fought with muskets and bayonets. So much for truth and integrity.
My advice to Mitt Romney is to call it like he sees it: dont sugarcoat it, dont pander to your critics, dont apologize for protecting America. The only way we will defeat Obama is to aggressively and unconditionally expose his radicalism and historic failure. Because liberals are willing to lie and deceive the public to no end claiming were actually better off than 4 years ago, Democrats ended slavery, and that GM was a socialist success - we must deploy unflinching perspective and cutthroat common sense to properly frame the newest poster boy for Anti-American, Islamic sympathizing, Marxist failures: Barack Hussein Obama.
Grant lost @ 7,000 men in 20 minutes at Cold Harbor.