Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Palin: QE3 is Upon Us
Conservative4Palin ^ | September 13 2012 | Stacy Drake

Posted on 09/13/2012 1:10:51 PM PDT by Bratch

Governor Palin has been warning us about this. Via Facebook:


President Obama is clearly revealing his rapid loss of any grip on the economic and security issues that are of utmost importance to our country. His economic and foreign policy blunders are manifesting chaos. On the same day when we see more chaos erupting in the Middle East and President Obama declaring that Egypt is no longer considered our ally, the Federal Reserve announced that it will spend $40 billion a month to purchase mortgage-backed securities with no end date set. QE3 is upon us.

In a speech nearly two years ago, I asked: “If [QE2] doesn’t work, what do we do then? Print even more money? What’s the end game here? Where will all this money printing on an unprecedented scale take us? Do we have any guarantees that QE2 won’t be followed by QE3, 4, and 5, until eventually – inevitably – no one will want to buy our debt anymore? What happens if the Fed becomes not just the buyer of last resort, but the buyer of only resort?”

As predicted, QE3 is upon us. Is it any wonder that the dollar is down against major currencies? This temporary, artificial economic “stimulus” bought at the expense of high inflation is no substitute for a stable currency and genuine long-term economic recovery. This is what happens when big government centralized planners try to “plan” our economy. President Obama is no doubt happy, though, that this latest sugar fix comes 53 days before the election.

- Sarah Palin





TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dollardevaluation; fed; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: bgill
pResident Down Grade * 2.

On purpose!

41 posted on 09/13/2012 5:49:52 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

The Enquirer has put out a Palin “divorce” story each year. Nothing unique about that. They’ve published all sorts of disproven junk on her and her family. Also, the ludicrous content in the McGinniss book was not ‘new’ to that time-frame either, as I read a thread covering it many months prior over at the C4P site. So neither of these things would have innately blindsided Palin after Indianola.

Where it might have had an effect is in that Palin could see that the media would happily peddle any lie, smear and innuendo they could to turn her potential campaign into a big sickening circus, making her odds all but impossible. Couple that with the GOP-E siding with their media buds, hacking away at her. And, although I believe she wanted to run, her MAIN goal was to ensure above all that Obama was removed from the presidency.


42 posted on 09/13/2012 5:50:19 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

“Exactly. It’s too easy to define Obama as a blundering fool, based on our own sense of normalcy and what is right.”

The following link is to an old FR thread, about an even older conservative booklet called “The Revolution Was”, written in 1938 about FDR and the New Deal. It is ALL happening again - amazingly, chillingly so. Only worse.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts

An Excerpt:

Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.

But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.

The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake......

Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.

The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.

The end held constantly in view was power.


43 posted on 09/13/2012 5:52:30 PM PDT by 21twelve (So I [God] gave them over to their stubborn hearts to follow their own devices. Psalm 81:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

ON PURPOSE!

BTTT

She just ROCKED on Hannity.

Will post the video as soon as it’s available.


44 posted on 09/13/2012 6:18:26 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: onyx

TYVM. I missed it.


45 posted on 09/13/2012 6:27:50 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I would like to see her go back to Alaska and take a Senate seat. Dethrone Duchess Murkowski or beat the Rat. She could go in and own the Senate and retire McConnnell as the GOP majority leader.
46 posted on 09/13/2012 6:30:41 PM PDT by Reily (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Perhaps she will. Ya never know.


47 posted on 09/13/2012 6:34:25 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

You’re most welcome.

GO SARAH!


48 posted on 09/13/2012 6:45:50 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: greene66

Mcguiness has no crediblity at all, anybody that dabbles in Trig-trutherism doesn’t. Besides none of it fits in with what college roommates recall about her. She was pretty stait-laced, and if a person was going to play it would be away at college not back at home with her guy around- not unless she was drunk or roofied. I don’t think Mcguiness even dared make direct claims, just innuendo, afraid of libel suits. As far as the divorce stories, have you ever seen her and Todd together? Those glances, etc. that’s no playacting.
On a local interview she mentioned her kids, Piper’s innocence, and i think a couple of them didn’t really want her to run. Her brother over on C4P said that she was respecting her family’s wishes. Later in an interview Todd said he was glad that she “sat this one out.”


49 posted on 09/13/2012 7:03:39 PM PDT by Truthfreesus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Truthfreesus

Oh, I agree. And by the way, there were slews of ‘legit’ journalists who went up to Alaska and interviewed hundreds of people, covering just about anybody, from grade-school to governorship, who had even the slightest contact with her. And those journalists were salivating for any speck of dirt they could find, but none was forthcoming. Indeed, reading all those interviews are kind of fascinating, and paint a picture of someone with solid religious and moral character.

McGinniss was referring to Palin as a “Nazi” even before he started his hit-job book, which was primarily comprised of the fetid fantasies of the moonbat Palingates bloggers, who seemed to be in a daily competition to out-do one another with peddling vile and outlandish fabrications.


50 posted on 09/13/2012 7:22:46 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Anyone working is on a “fixed” income, not just the retired.
Since 2006 the majority democrats in the house & senate, plus the likes of Bernake had been working dillegently to reduce this country to the likes of kenya and other 3rd world countries. All pretending to even out the ecenomic field. Germany tried this after WWII. Gave everyone the same amount of money...the “haves” knew how to save money and how to make more. The entrepeneurs are usually cautously aggressive in their quests to put forth their products, as their businesses grow. As their the demand for their product grows, they hire employees. They depend on employees just as the employees depend on the job. This is not true with politicians, such as we’ve seen in the democrat party, of late, and the street organizer in the whitehouse.


51 posted on 09/14/2012 6:43:44 AM PDT by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Pretty deep analysis from someone who’s supposed to be an air-headed bimbo.


52 posted on 09/14/2012 7:52:23 AM PDT by kevkrom (Those in a rush to trample the Constitution seem to forget that it is the source of their authority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten
armed with nothing more then a keyboard and her wit... this lady exposes the left for the amateurs they are...

I subscribe to Palin's Facebook feeds (if that's what you call them). I think it is a very effective way for her to communicate to the American people, bypassing the mainstream media.

I wonder why the Romney campaign does not take a similar tack. Mitt Romney should put out statements via Facebook (and other social media like Twitter). Even if he has to hire somebody to ghostwrite them for him, it will allow him to get his message out there, unfiltered by the media.

His messages are sure to get tweeted and re-tweeted where millions of people will get them immediately, forcing the mainstream media to pay attention to them.

53 posted on 09/15/2012 9:23:51 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

Gov Palin is a genius!


54 posted on 09/16/2012 4:31:15 AM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (Time to Reload)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson