Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

In this case it most likely was illegal though, because the law requires the registrant to have been born in Hawaii and with a non-valid record the State of Hawaii could not say whether he was or wasn’t born in Hawaii. My suspicion is that they tried to resolve that dilemma by making the new BC non-valid just like the original, so that in neither case would they say that they vouch for any birth claims.

And reassigning Obama SOMEBODY ELSE’s BC# is not authorized in HRS 338-17.7. The only reason to change Stig Waidelich’s BC# is if Stig Waidelich is in danger. The only reason to change Virginia Sunahara’s BC# is if Virginia Sunahara is in danger. And we know that not to be the case. The new BC was not supposed to infringe on anything legally real; was just supposed to be a cosmetic cover-up so somebody could claim to be somebody else and the “bad guys” couldn’t find them.


54 posted on 09/14/2012 4:42:39 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion
Did you read Jack Cashill's latest article at American Thinker? He basically says that the Hawaiian government is suffused with Yakuza criminals using it for whatever they need it for. He Also says that they sell social security numbers as part of their racket.

If you haven't read it, you really need to read it. It explains a lot and it makes sense.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/a_possible_explanation_for_obamas_connecticut_social_security_number.html

61 posted on 09/14/2012 8:17:51 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson