Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There may be no anti-Islamic movie at all
CS Monitor ^ | 09-12-2012 | Dan Murphy

Posted on 09/14/2012 9:44:37 PM PDT by bronxville

[...]Now comes the part with the compelling case of no movie at all.

Abdurrahman writes (embedded link):

If you watch closely, you can see that when the actors are reading parts of the script that do not contain Islam-specific language, the audio from the sound stage is used (the audio that was recorded as the actors were simultaneously being filmed). But anytime the actors are referring to something specific to the religion (the Prophet Muhammed, the Quran, etc.) the audio recorded during filming is replaced with a poorly executed post-production dub. And if you look EVEN closer, you can see that the actors’ mouths are saying something other than what the dub is saying.

For example, at 2:53, the voiceover says “His name is Muhammed. And we can call him The Father Unknown.” In this case, the whole line is dubbed, and it appears the actor is actually saying, “His name is George (?). And we can call him The Father Unknown.” ...once you start to look for these dubs, it’s hard to see anything else.

And Grey writes (embedded link):

As the video above — cut from the YouTube video tied to a global controversy — shows, nearly all of the names in the movie's "trailer" — is a compilation of the most clumsily overdubbed moments from what is in reality an incoherent, haphazardly-edited set of scenes. Among the overdubbed words is "Mohammed," suggesting that the footage was taken from a film about something else entirely. The footage also suggests multiple video sources — there are obvious and jarring discrepancies among actors and locations... whoever made (it) may well have made use of little more than the standard editing software Final Cut Pro — far from a cast and crew of over 100 and millions of dollars. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 9112012embassyattack; antiislamicmovie; guyfawkes; islammovie; islammoviemaker; islamriots; noislammovie; phoneymovie; voicesdubed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
"Both make very, very convincing points (read their full posts) and if you watch the footage carefully, it's hard to escape their conclusions. In one scene a man is apparently teaching his daughter about the evils of Islam and writes on a blackboard that "Man + X = BT" as he explains to her that "Man + X = Islamic terrorist." Then he writes the equation in reverse, again intoning "Islamic terrorist" as he writes "BT."

If suspicions are right, the low-quality footage has been re-purposed from somewhere, and you'd expect someone to come forward and explain soon (since a lot of actors are involved).

What's really going on here? I have no idea."

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all

1 posted on 09/14/2012 9:44:45 PM PDT by bronxville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Well, I guess the obvious answer is a false flag operation to get the Islamic horde cover for their coordinated attacks on 9/11 anniversary.


2 posted on 09/14/2012 9:50:43 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

If it doesn’t have talking cats and dogs or Hitler in the bunker in it, it shouldn’t even be on Youtube.


3 posted on 09/14/2012 9:52:28 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The United States of America apologizing to knuckledragging, cavedwelling Neandethals. Whodda thunk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
Garcia said that there was a man who identified as "Bacile" on set, but that he was Egyptian and frequently spoke Arabic.
4 posted on 09/14/2012 9:55:26 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Obama is trying to sell a YouTube clip as a Wag the Dog movie.


5 posted on 09/14/2012 9:55:49 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bronxville
Muslim world (in the voice of the immortal Rosanna Rosannadanna): Never mind.
6 posted on 09/14/2012 9:57:59 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

It is double-plus ungood to question the Ministry of Truth...


7 posted on 09/14/2012 10:11:55 PM PDT by jonascord (Hot Flash: Your "government" is no longer mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Why is no one mentioning that some of the egyptian rioters were wearing guy fawkes masks and spraypainting occupy graffiti on our embassy walls?


8 posted on 09/14/2012 10:14:08 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

Is that the nonpracticing Coptic Christian who is/was in trouble with the law and spent $5 mil on an extremely crappy produced movie? I read where he had family over there, not sure why he’d want to make a movie in Arabic, knowing it was going to be shown over there, placing his family in danger, especially considering the crazy neighbors.


9 posted on 09/14/2012 10:14:12 PM PDT by bronxville (Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

It’s interesting that they happened to find an actual Coptic Christian to blame.


10 posted on 09/14/2012 10:16:23 PM PDT by bronxville (Margaret Sanger - “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

I believe the whole thing is a set-up. But by who is the question to ask. We all ready know the why.


11 posted on 09/14/2012 10:19:57 PM PDT by JPII Be Not Afraid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

LOL


12 posted on 09/14/2012 10:23:24 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bronxville
0bama's newest release of Wag The Dog
13 posted on 09/14/2012 10:23:44 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon; bronxville

How did these dirt-poor Libyans *see* this film....most of them earn $2./day...what? They all have iPhones? ‘Net connections?

They were stirred up by their immams at services. Aided and abetted by our very own president...leading from behind.


14 posted on 09/14/2012 10:23:55 PM PDT by Daffynition (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ecomcon
Fast & Furious II.. No wonder why the DOJ/FBI are investigating this.. They want to silence those who KNOW that this movie was originally produced for other purposes and/or CHANGED by our CIA/NSA/DOD to cover for 0bama the moment a terror attack occurs so as to create a diversion and blame an American citizen instead of 0bama's STINKING pro-Muslim Brotherhood foreign policy.

After reading this article, I indeed call FALSE FLAG here.

15 posted on 09/14/2012 10:25:39 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
no one mentioning that some of the egyptian rioters were wearing guy fawkes masks and spraypainting occupy graffiti on our embassy walls?

I saw that too. Meanwhile the MSM is focusing on Romney being the bad guy.

16 posted on 09/14/2012 10:43:19 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JPII Be Not Afraid

My hope is the FBI is investigating so they can show that this “film” was changed by the muslims. If they’re investigating this because they want to “charge” the film maker with something such as inciting a riot, man, are we screwed.


17 posted on 09/14/2012 10:43:54 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

This has all the hallmarks of a U.S. gov’t ‘cover story’ to protect 0bama.. Even the original author is FABRICATED TO BE AN ISRAELI to gin up heightened anger about the movie. Now we know this particular aspect isn’t true whatsoever. If 0bama’s goal is to create distrust in our gov’t, he’s doing a fine job of it.


18 posted on 09/14/2012 10:44:43 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, Mesta.


19 posted on 09/14/2012 10:45:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bronxville
Is that the nonpracticing Coptic Christian who is/was in trouble with the law and spent $5 mil on an extremely crappy produced movie? I read where he had family over there, not sure why he’d want to make a movie in Arabic, knowing it was going to be shown over there, placing his family in danger, especially considering the crazy neighbors.

And before that he was an Israeli Christian and just a few hours before that he was an Israeli Jew. The man is cutting a wide swath through life! /s

20 posted on 09/14/2012 10:47:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson