Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DManA; abb

When the two-paper cities began becoming one paper cities I thought a good idea would be for the second paper to either shrink or even become a tabloid. They might have found a niche instead of trying to be a clone of the bigger paper.

Imagine a thinner paper with a conservative editorial page focusing mostly on local news and issues with a small staff. Sort of like a small town daily in a big city, it’s circulation wouldn’t have to be nearly as big as the other to stay afloat.

But they all wanted to be the NY Times or Wash Post.


52 posted on 09/17/2012 9:36:10 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

There is still this body of thought out there that if a newspaper becomes “local” only, they can actually turn a profit.

After watching the “local” papers up close for over three years and sitting next to their “reporters” in town meetings, I can tell you they are not faring much better than the big metro papers.

The ONLY thing that’s keeping the local weeklies and small town dailies from folding is the money they get from government in the form of legal ads. Which is a direct subsidy, in this day and time of the internet and government websites.

Take that away from them, and they dry up and blow away.


56 posted on 09/17/2012 9:43:52 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson