“and the point is that the ONLY case of ‘diet pill rage’ was McDonald’s and that thousands of other users of diet pills never experienced any similar symptoms...”
Where exactly did you pull that “fact” from? At that time, “diet pills” were basically various forms of amphetamines, aka “speed”. There were a great many adverse side effects, complications, and addictions caused by those “diet pills”, which is why most of them are illegal now.
I didn’t pull it from anywhere...I was simply restating the defense argument to illustrate why the poster’s analogy was wrong