Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Right Strikes Back: A New Legal Challenge for Obamacare
The Atlantic ^ | Sept 17 2012 | Jack M. Balkin

Posted on 09/17/2012 3:36:25 PM PDT by WilliamIII

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2012 3:36:26 PM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Good post!


2 posted on 09/17/2012 3:39:25 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Seems pretty cut and dry. Unless the court wants to ignore the constitution. Nah, they wouldn’t do that.


3 posted on 09/17/2012 3:39:25 PM PDT by gotribe (WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Now we are getting somewhere.

Hey Roberts, explain to me where in the eff in the enumerated powers the federal government has the power to tax for purposes other than what is listed?

The plain answer is..he can not explain it, and they can NOT do it.


4 posted on 09/17/2012 3:48:09 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I’m afraid this is a dead issue. It will take a massive effort from both houses of Congress to get rid of ZeroCare.

Even If this rather tenuous looking basis for an argument Makes it to SCOTUS, remember that CJ Roberts shafted us by declaring, in effect, that Congress, now owns the Power to Tax us because of our Inactivity in entering the stream of Commerce.

If Roberts and the others have the gall to shovel That onto our plates, the House of Origination isn’t going to cut any mustard with him Either.

What we Need, is Originalist SCOTUS appointments, and we’re Not going to get them overnight and without a royal tooth and nail vetting battle.


5 posted on 09/17/2012 3:49:12 PM PDT by To-Whose-Benefit? (It is Error alone which needs the support of Government. The Truth can stand by itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Unless Roberts is impeached. ... SOS.


6 posted on 09/17/2012 3:51:59 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: To-Whose-Benefit?

Roberts and the liberal 5 will find a way to outfox these guys, IF they even listen to the argument. Our best hope is Romney and that is no sure thing either,even if he is elected.


7 posted on 09/17/2012 3:53:25 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

This is a waste of time. The Constitution specifically says that the Senate has the right to amend revenue bills, which is what this is.


8 posted on 09/17/2012 3:57:27 PM PDT by Siegfried X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Roberts will say that while it is indeed a tax, it is not designed to raise revenue, only to cover costs of the program.


9 posted on 09/17/2012 4:01:09 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Whatever a homosexual union might be or represent, it is not physically marital. - F.Cardinal George)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

our only chance there is with Ryan, he said last week on this issue they will repeal, then as the crowd was cheering he quietly said, “That is a Fact”, as if to reinforce to us his determination to do so. I do believe that man.


10 posted on 09/17/2012 4:07:07 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Strong legal argument + strong pressure = Yes
Strong legal argument + weak pressure = maybe
Weak legal argument + strong pressure = maybe
Weak legal argument + weak pressure = No

This argument is not compelling under the current circumstances (demi-tyrant as President and eminent election) nor is anyone in congress capable of advancing the argument.

11 posted on 09/17/2012 4:07:57 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (All Y'all White Peoples is racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks WilliamIII.


12 posted on 09/17/2012 4:14:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crz
ey Roberts, explain to me where in the eff in the enumerated powers the federal government has the power to tax for purposes other than what is listed?

While he's at it, perhaps he can explain how, if the ACA it is a tax, the administrative branch then has powers to issue waivers at its discretion. Seems a total violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

13 posted on 09/17/2012 4:20:25 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

bttt


14 posted on 09/17/2012 4:29:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: To-Whose-Benefit?

I don’t think that it will be as difficult as people think to get rid of 0-care. Although the legal and legislative challenges are daunting, the plan is simply economically unsustainable and impractable. With so many regulations, low reimbursement and rationing boards, providers will simply drop out of the system and create access problems so great that the system will implode. Meanwhile, costs will go out of control because of bureaucratic expansion that has nothing to do with health care delivery. A reversion to a direct pay system would be more likely at that point because the Federal government will simply not have enough money to enact a top down and fully socialized system.


15 posted on 09/17/2012 4:43:14 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

Damn those conservatives, wanting to follow the Constitution and all....


16 posted on 09/17/2012 4:44:43 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII

I am shaking with excitement!!


17 posted on 09/17/2012 4:51:16 PM PDT by diamond6 (http://catholicknight.blogspot.com/p/catholic-prophecy.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

In short..the whole Dam thing is unconstitutional and I demanded-I actually called my rep to demand that they haul Roberts in front of congress to have him explain how he came to that ruling. They can do that.


18 posted on 09/17/2012 5:12:31 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: diamond6

The PLF has won more cases that are complicated than many realize. Using a bill that is essentially a ‘shell bill’ to write Obamacare & get it thru the Senate is dead illegal.


19 posted on 09/17/2012 5:16:36 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: crz
Hey Roberts, explain to me where in the eff in the enumerated powers the federal government has the power to tax for purposes other than what is listed?

In my opinion, Justice Roberts isn't a fool. He didn't get where his is by playing the fool either. He backed the Obama administration into saying it was a tax. I'm sure Roberts is (was) wondering when someone was going to set the hook and reel it in. He can't advise any body or organization that Obamacare isn't legal, he just left a welcome mat out with big flashing neon lights. If this doesn't work, Obamacare was passed on a "Reconciliation Vote". A reconciliation vote can only used for budget bills, so there is another angle to kill Obamacare.

20 posted on 09/17/2012 5:29:08 PM PDT by Traveler59 ( Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson