The parasite gathers for an attack!
I see this as a real advantage for us.. The Unions, already rejected by the people several times are re-racking the table for another IN-YOUR-FACE attempt to tell the public they don’t really count..
I can’t imagine they would actually do this AGAIN, but just look at the teachers in Chicago, and ask yourself could they really be this stupid, the answer has to be.. YES!
No problem. Tell the “teacher” and union a**holes that you will talk to them after the appeal is heard.
Not a bad deal when you’re spending Other People’s Money (OPM).
Only in a twisted liberal’s mind can the elimination of forced unionization be considered a limitation of a person’s right to free association.
Just reported tonight Milwaukee Public Schools retirement obligations have been reduced by one billion dollars due to Act 10.
Wisconsin Unions seeking new contracts ping
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Here we go again....
OK, after the election...just take ‘em out.
Tout finis, ah-gone bye bye, hasta la vista, sianara, auf vieder sehen, see ya, wouldn’t wanna be ya!
Wisc. AG files for stay of Act10 decision.MADISON — Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have filed a Motion to Stay the September 14, 2012, decision by the Hon. Juan Colas, Dane County Circuit Court Branch 10, in the case of Madison Teachers, Inc., et al. v. Scott Walker, et al., which declared portions of 2011 Wis. Act 10 unconstitutional. The Motion, which was filed with the Dane County Circuit Court, asks that the decision be stayed pending an appeal to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals.
The motion argues that the decision is likely to be overturned on appeal and that a stay is needed to avoid confusion and to avoid other harm that might result if local governments are not able to take full advantage of Act 10 while an appeal is pending.
Regarding the motion, Van Hollen remarked, “Act 10 addressed real and significant financial problems faced by local governments. It makes no sense to force a return to a broken system before the appellate process is completed.”