Thanks, Fred. Breitbart has been phenomenal on this. This is a total failure of both policy and function of the Sec. of State AND obamao. Almost as if the crude b**ch wanted this to happen— and happen to obamao (clintonesqe writ all over it- Arkancide like).
Refreshing my comment/links from earlier post by you:
OK, so the US (namely idiot Hillary) hires a Brit firm of ex-SAS or ex-SBS (boat squadron) to “protect” the ambassador— HOWEVER, does so with ROEs that do not allow weapons with AMMO? WHAT company would ever agree to that? Who working for them, ever would? This stinks rather a great deal.
Of course, with our own superior SEALs, obamao takes a victory lap, continuously-— and because of that we couldn’t use any SEALs-— except 2 WERE killed (who were there working as CIA— which is poorly “covered” id in this case by supposedly real contracted protection). The brit organization has a mole in it for the libyans/al qaeda in that shadow world. All the more reason for the US NOT to use any but our most trusted protection. Mismanagement, intentional. And, they got the money they wanted from the quadaffi people— did it go to bill, hillary’s or obamao’s swiss accounts?
So all the trouble in the MIDDLE EAST couldn’t possibly be due to obamao’s idiotic trumpeting of the actual TEAM involved in osama kill, oh NOOOOO. Many more questions SCREAM to be answered. The OPSEC organization should be screaming more than a little— and call obama out for the loss of yet again more SEALs from lack of OPSec, finally being exposed as a planned operation-— not caused by some obscure internet movie TRAILER (movie is NOT out yet, and this is piss poor “cover”). Darryl Issa time!!!
Blue Mountain’s website: http://www.bluemountaingroup.co.uk/
And where they get their name:
“At the heart of all we do is our company ethos, our Professional Code of Conduct and our Customer Charter.
Our ‘Blue Mountain’ name derives from a poem inscribed on the clock tower at the headquarters of 22 Special Air Service Regiment in Hereford:
“We are the pilgrims, master; we shall go
Always a little further; it may be
Beyond that last blue mountain barred with snow
Across that angry or that glimmering sea”.
I’ve got one for these brits, cause it is a twofer for the anti-colonial obamao—money in hand and a brit company compromised:
“Half a league half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred:
‘Forward, the Light Brigade!
Charge for the guns’ he said:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.”
The US has recognized the current Libyan government as legit, as messed up as that is. Thus, the Libyans approve who can be contractors there, much the way the Iraqi’s and Afghani’s do in their respective countries. Folks don’t realize that the Iraqi’s could tell the US to remove every security contractor currently working in that cesspool and there’s nothing the US can do about it. Much like countries expelling diplomats. Only the security contractors don’t have any type of diplomatic immunity.
The only way around that, is for the US Govt. to give the contractors OFFICIAL credentials, IE Diplomatic Passports. The State Dept gave thousands of those things out in the early part of the WOT. But has been engaged in a serious effort to get them back. If the individual has the official cred’s than the State Dept can be held accountable for his actions. They learned that in Iraq, hence why no one has ‘Dip’ passports anymore.
If the Libyan’s didn’t want any American’s there doing security, the State Dept did what they thought was the next best thing.
Was it the right thing and do I agree with it? F*CK NO!!! This administration couldn’t tell the truth if you asked them the day of the week.
But, if the Blue Mountain Group had/has the contract, they probably put a very small group of Brits on the ground and had them hire local thugs. But, they were still billing the State Dept as if they had a whole battalion of SAS/SBS guys over there. And they were probably paying the locals about $50/day. That’s how it has/was done in Iraq and Afghanistan. Charge the most you can charge and pay the least you can pay.