This is the most important story of the day and the first good news I can remember in a long time. My guess is, the thread will peter out at less than 20 responses and of course, no coverage from what passes for the “conservative” media.
I don't know if it's the most important, but it's certainly up there. IMHO, all jury nominees should be informed about jury nullification as one of their options.
If you send a lawn service to a property without an edger, there's a chance the job will not get done properly or as effectively as it otherwise should have for want of a tool they should have had available.
Similarly, sending a jury into deliberations without all the tools they should have at their disposal inhibits their ability to do their job as effectively as they otherwise might.