Also risky for Romney. He declines to represent 47% but will rep Israel.
This is a secret donor ad but it is probably Adelson paying for it.
“There goes any doubt that Netanyahoo is interfering in the U.S. Presidential election. Very risky business for Israel.”
More risky FOR THE UNITED STATES is to be ignoring Iran.
“Coinciding with the release of the Wait for What? ad campaign, SAN released the results of polls it commissioned which show that in two key swing states, Florida and Ohio, a large majority of voters believe that if allowed to develop nuclear weapons, Iran would use them to arm terrorist groups to attack the United States.”
REPEAT: “TO ATTACK THE UNITED STATES.”
“Also risky for Romney. He declines to represent 47% but will rep Israel.”
BS. What are you, working for Obama now? Romney didn’t “decline to represent 47%” he described 47% of obama voters / being on the dole and probably not voting for him.
And standing with Israel against OUR COMMON JIHADI ENEMY is not “repping” Israel.
“This is a secret donor ad but it is probably Adelson paying for it.”
Really? have a source that the BIG JOO is paying for it? SAN is run by Kristol AND LIZ CHENEY.
“Not much is known about the players behind Secure America Now because contributions to it are not tax-deductible, which means that the names of its donors do not have to be made public. According to the press release on these polls, however, Jeri Thompson, former political consultant and the wife of former US Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN), is an SAN advisory board member.
According to Thompson, the just-released polls reveal that a big factor driving the foreign policy focus is women between the age of 30 and 55. She said that the so-called Security Moms have not gone away since 9/11 and must be accounted for in the current foreign-policy debate and in this election.”
So “Security moms” could be part of the move of women voters switching from Obama to Romney.
Do you oppose that?